Globalistics and Globalization Studies: Difference between revisions
unknown (talk) (Created page with " '''* Book: GLOBALISTICS AND GLOBALIZATION STUDIES. Edited by Leonid E. Grinin, Ilya V. Ilyin, and Andrey V. Korotayev. Volgograd: ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House, 2012. – 40...") |
unknown (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''* Book: GLOBALISTICS AND GLOBALIZATION STUDIES. Edited by Leonid E. Grinin, Ilya V. Ilyin, and Andrey V. Korotayev. Volgograd: ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House, 2012. – 400 pp.''' | '''* Book: GLOBALISTICS AND GLOBALIZATION STUDIES. Edited by Leonid E. Grinin, Ilya V. Ilyin, and Andrey V. Korotayev. Volgograd: ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House, 2012. – 400 pp.''' | ||
URL = | URL = https://www.sociostudies.org/books/globalistics_and_globalization_studies/ | ||
Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
Part 4. Perspectives and the New World Order. | Part 4. Perspectives and the New World Order. | ||
==ToC== | ==ToC== | ||
===Part 1. Historical Dimension=== | ===Part 1. Historical Dimension=== | ||
Line 90: | Line 91: | ||
* Leonid E. Grinin and Andrey V. Korotayev. The Coming Epoch of New Coalitions: Possible Global Scenarios (Full text) | * Leonid E. Grinin and Andrey V. Korotayev. The Coming Epoch of New Coalitions: Possible Global Scenarios (Full text) | ||
=Discussion= | |||
==Why [[Globalistics]], not Global Studies?== | |||
Leonid Grinin et al.: | |||
"The volume is entitled Globalistics and Globalization Studies. However, '''why Globalistics, not Global Studies? The notion of Globalistics was born in Russia''', this is a translation of the Russian term globalistika; however, we believe it might be useful within the English Global Studies thesaurus. We are sure that the introduction of this term is justifiable, because it expresses the vision of systemic and epistemological unity of global processes, of the presence of some relatively autonomous field with its own research subject. Morphologically this term is identical with such well-established designations of academic disciplines as Economics, Linguistics, Physics, and so on. | |||
Globalistics emerged in the USSR in the 1970s and 1980s first of all as a result of philosophic and scientific scrutiny of the global problems of the humankind. As this research was conducted within quite a rigorous and orderly philosophical framework, in contrast with the Western Global Studies, the Soviet/Russian Globalistics acquired certain systematic qualities of a rather coherent academic field from the very beginning. We believe that this turned out to be a significant advantage of the Russian version of the study of global processes and phenomena. Note also that Globalistics has been developing as a synthesis of various academic disciplines (that is well in the mainstream of the contemporary scientific trends); on the other hand, academics working in this field have been trying to impart to it a certain conceptual unity. That is why Globalistics (in contrast with some other philosophical schools) experienced not collapse but flourishing in the post-Soviet history of Russia. In the 1990s and 2000s it became one of the most productive research directions in Russia. One may, for example, recollect that the first encyclopedias of Globalistics/Global Studies were published just in Russia (Mazour and Chumakov 2003, 2006; Mazour, Chumakov, and Gay 2006). Another example is represented by the establishment (seven years ago) of the Faculty of Global Studies (FGS MSU) within the Moscow State University; this is one of the few academic and educational bodies specializing in the realm of Globalistics. The staff of the faculty is facing a number of conceptual issues such as how to develop research and educational process; what the optimal combination of research methods in Globalistics is; how to form educational trajectories in reasonable ways, to arrange and coordinate disciplines within the curriculum etc. Globalistics is a cross-disciplinary integrative field of research. It aims at investigating global problems in all their facets: from causes, laws and tendencies of global processes through an insight into positive and negative effects to the survival of humankind and the protection of the biosphere (Chumakov 2008). Thus, Globalistics may be regarded as a sort of systemic and more or less integrated ‘core’ within Global Studies. The development of Globalistics results in the emergence of a special form of multidisciplinary scientific knowledge that is sometimes denoted as ‘global knowledge’, that is the knowledge that reflects all the global processes and systems which exist on the planet Earth in the framework of their planetary unity and evolutionary significance. | |||
Globalistics is a very young academic field, that is why it has a large number of unresolved problems. It has not been fully incorporated yet into the system of academic disciplines. An attempt to contribute to the solving of this problem has been undertaken in a recently published monograph (Ilyin and Ursul 2009), where Globalistics is considered as a very important element of the system of integrative-scientific knowledge that forms the modern scientific worldview based on the principles of global evolutionism. This system of knowledge emerges in the way of interdisciplinary synthesis and integrative processes within sciences. Earlier the growth of knowledge took place most effectively in the framework of particular academic disciplines through further differentiation and specialization of science; now this tends to be achieved through interdisciplinary processes of knowledge synthesis, as well as synthesis of fundamental and applied researches. Global Studies are rapidly becoming leaders of modern scientific-education processes, as well as a basis of modern scientific worldview. Development of Globalistics and similar disciplines2 suggests that some other fields of academic research may find themselves under the influence of ‘global attractor’. One may well expect that names and more and more traditional fields of academic research will get a ‘global prefix’." | |||
(http://www.sociostudies.org/books/files/globalistics_and_globalization_studies/005-008.pdf) | |||
[[Category:Globalization]] | |||
[[Category:Civilizational Analysis]] | |||
[[Category:Books]] | |||
[[Category:Globalization]] | [[Category:Globalization]] | ||
[[Category:Civilizational Analysis]] | [[Category:Civilizational Analysis]] | ||
[[Category:Books]] | [[Category:Books]] | ||
[[Category:Global Governance]] |
Revision as of 08:08, 28 June 2023
* Book: GLOBALISTICS AND GLOBALIZATION STUDIES. Edited by Leonid E. Grinin, Ilya V. Ilyin, and Andrey V. Korotayev. Volgograd: ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House, 2012. – 400 pp.
URL = https://www.sociostudies.org/books/globalistics_and_globalization_studies/
Description
"Today globalization can be treated as the most important global process. It is a multi-faceted phenomenon and in every country it has its own image. One can get a truly objective picture of the rapidly changing and integrating world only through a synthesis of all those particular visions. In the present anthology one can find perceptions of globalization by a number of famous scholars from different countries of the world (Ervin Laszlo, Roland Robertson, Shmuel N. Eisenstadt, Randall Collins, Christopher Chase-Dunn, William Thompson and others), but one can also get to know rather peculiar visions of globalization by the Russian scientists.
The volume is entitled Globalistics and Globalization Studies. Globalistics may be regarded as a sort of systemic and more or less integrated ‘core’ within Global Studies."
Contents
"The anthology consists of four parts presenting a wide range of views on the meaning of the contemporary epoch, the past and the future of some important global processes.
Part 1. Historical Dimension.
Part 2. Globalistics, Global Studies and Models.
Part 3. Trends, Risks, and Problems.
Part 4. Perspectives and the New World Order.
ToC
Part 1. Historical Dimension
- William R. Thompson.The Lead Economy Sequence in World Politics. (From Sung China to the United States): Selected Counterfactuals (Full text)
- Andrey V. Korotayev and Leonid E. Grinin. Global Urbanization and Political Development of the World System (Full text)
- Christopher Chase-Dunn, Richard Niemeyer, Alexis Alvarez, Hiroko Inoue, Kirk Lawrence, and James Love. Global Cycles of Rise and Fall, Upsweeps and Collapses: Changes in the Scale of Settlements and Polities since the Bronze Age (Full text)
- Tatyana L. Shestova. Global History as a Trend of Global Studies (Full text)
Part 2. Globalistics, Global Studies and Models
- Ilya V. Ilyin and Arkadi D. Ursul. Globalistics: New Investigative Trends in Science (Full text)
- Alexander N. Chumakov. Social Aspects of Globalization (From a Globalistics Viewpoint)(Full text)
- Ilya V. Ilyin and Alexey V. Ivanov. Global Processes, Systems and Problems through Globalistics Lens: A Path to a New Synthesis(Full text)
- Axel Dreher, Noel Gaston, Pim Martens, and Lotte Van Boxem. Measuring Globalization – Opening the Black Box. A Critical Analysis of Globalization Indices(Full text)
- Andrey V. Korotayev. Globalization and Mathematical modeling of Global Development (Full text)
- Michael Golosovsky. Hyperbolic Growth of the Human Population of the Earth: Analysis of Existing Models (Full text)
- Sergey Yu. Malkov. The Logic of World Development(Full text)
- Ilya V. Ilyin and Arkadi D. Ursul. Global Evolutionism: Theoretical and Methodological Problems (Full text)
Part 3. Trends, Risks, and Problems
- Randall Collins. Geopolitical Conditions of Internationalism, Human Rights, and World Law (Full text)
- Leonid E. Grinin.. State Sovereignty in the Age of Globalization: Will it Survive? (Full text)
- William C. Gay. Globalization, the Problem of War, and Normative Issues (Full text)
- Andrey V. Korotayev, Julia V. Zinkina, Justislav V. Bogevolnov, and Artemy S. Malkov. Global Unconditional Convergence among Larger Economies after 1998? (Full text)
- Alexander S. Rozanov. Combating International Terrorism in the Context of Globalization (Full text)
- Оlga G. Leonova. New Geopolitical Trends in the Globalized World (Full text)
- Alexander N. Chumakov. Culture in the Global World: Between Dialogue and Conflict (Full text)
- Galina A. Drobot. The Issue of Global Governance in the Context of International Relations Theory (Full text)
- Vladimir V. Klimenko and Alexey G. Tereshin. World Energy and Climate in the Twenty-First Century in the Context of Historical Trends: Clear Constraints to the Future Growth (Full text)
Part 4. Perspectives and the New World Order
- Shmuel N. Eisenstadt. Contemporary Globalization and New Civilizational Formations (Full text)
- Roland Robertson. The ‘Return’ of Religion and the Conflicted Condition of World Order (Full text)
- Ervin Laszlo. Global Bifurcation: The Decision Window (Full text)
- Valentina M. Bondarenko. Global Processes and Their Dynamics: Two Paradigms of Development (Full text)
- Leonid E. Grinin. The Leadership in the Future Global World or Chinese Joker in the World Pack(Full text)
- Leonid E. Grinin and Andrey V. Korotayev. The Coming Epoch of New Coalitions: Possible Global Scenarios (Full text)
Discussion
Why Globalistics, not Global Studies?
Leonid Grinin et al.:
"The volume is entitled Globalistics and Globalization Studies. However, why Globalistics, not Global Studies? The notion of Globalistics was born in Russia, this is a translation of the Russian term globalistika; however, we believe it might be useful within the English Global Studies thesaurus. We are sure that the introduction of this term is justifiable, because it expresses the vision of systemic and epistemological unity of global processes, of the presence of some relatively autonomous field with its own research subject. Morphologically this term is identical with such well-established designations of academic disciplines as Economics, Linguistics, Physics, and so on.
Globalistics emerged in the USSR in the 1970s and 1980s first of all as a result of philosophic and scientific scrutiny of the global problems of the humankind. As this research was conducted within quite a rigorous and orderly philosophical framework, in contrast with the Western Global Studies, the Soviet/Russian Globalistics acquired certain systematic qualities of a rather coherent academic field from the very beginning. We believe that this turned out to be a significant advantage of the Russian version of the study of global processes and phenomena. Note also that Globalistics has been developing as a synthesis of various academic disciplines (that is well in the mainstream of the contemporary scientific trends); on the other hand, academics working in this field have been trying to impart to it a certain conceptual unity. That is why Globalistics (in contrast with some other philosophical schools) experienced not collapse but flourishing in the post-Soviet history of Russia. In the 1990s and 2000s it became one of the most productive research directions in Russia. One may, for example, recollect that the first encyclopedias of Globalistics/Global Studies were published just in Russia (Mazour and Chumakov 2003, 2006; Mazour, Chumakov, and Gay 2006). Another example is represented by the establishment (seven years ago) of the Faculty of Global Studies (FGS MSU) within the Moscow State University; this is one of the few academic and educational bodies specializing in the realm of Globalistics. The staff of the faculty is facing a number of conceptual issues such as how to develop research and educational process; what the optimal combination of research methods in Globalistics is; how to form educational trajectories in reasonable ways, to arrange and coordinate disciplines within the curriculum etc. Globalistics is a cross-disciplinary integrative field of research. It aims at investigating global problems in all their facets: from causes, laws and tendencies of global processes through an insight into positive and negative effects to the survival of humankind and the protection of the biosphere (Chumakov 2008). Thus, Globalistics may be regarded as a sort of systemic and more or less integrated ‘core’ within Global Studies. The development of Globalistics results in the emergence of a special form of multidisciplinary scientific knowledge that is sometimes denoted as ‘global knowledge’, that is the knowledge that reflects all the global processes and systems which exist on the planet Earth in the framework of their planetary unity and evolutionary significance.
Globalistics is a very young academic field, that is why it has a large number of unresolved problems. It has not been fully incorporated yet into the system of academic disciplines. An attempt to contribute to the solving of this problem has been undertaken in a recently published monograph (Ilyin and Ursul 2009), where Globalistics is considered as a very important element of the system of integrative-scientific knowledge that forms the modern scientific worldview based on the principles of global evolutionism. This system of knowledge emerges in the way of interdisciplinary synthesis and integrative processes within sciences. Earlier the growth of knowledge took place most effectively in the framework of particular academic disciplines through further differentiation and specialization of science; now this tends to be achieved through interdisciplinary processes of knowledge synthesis, as well as synthesis of fundamental and applied researches. Global Studies are rapidly becoming leaders of modern scientific-education processes, as well as a basis of modern scientific worldview. Development of Globalistics and similar disciplines2 suggests that some other fields of academic research may find themselves under the influence of ‘global attractor’. One may well expect that names and more and more traditional fields of academic research will get a ‘global prefix’."
(http://www.sociostudies.org/books/files/globalistics_and_globalization_studies/005-008.pdf)