Proof of Humanity: Difference between revisions
unknown (talk) (Created page with " =Discussion= Daniel Pinchbeck on Proof of Humanity from Democracy.Earth: "Proof of Humanity seeks to address one of the core problems of the Internet – in fact, the essen...") |
unknown (talk) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''= "Proof of Humanity, a system combining webs of trust, with reverse Turing tests, and dispute resolution to create a sybil-proof list of humans".''' | |||
URL = https://www.proofofhumanity.id/ | |||
=Discussion= | =Discussion= | ||
| Line 11: | Line 15: | ||
(https://danielpinchbeck.substack.com/p/crypto-criticism-part-two?) | (https://danielpinchbeck.substack.com/p/crypto-criticism-part-two?) | ||
[[Category:Cryptoledger Applications]] | |||
[[Category:Cryptoledger Applications]] | [[Category:Cryptoledger Applications]] | ||
Revision as of 10:13, 12 January 2022
= "Proof of Humanity, a system combining webs of trust, with reverse Turing tests, and dispute resolution to create a sybil-proof list of humans".
URL = https://www.proofofhumanity.id/
Discussion
Daniel Pinchbeck on Proof of Humanity from Democracy.Earth:
"Proof of Humanity seeks to address one of the core problems of the Internet – in fact, the essential flaw that led to the current catastrophe in which corporations like Google and Facebook control our personal data and sell it to advertisers as their product. The problem is that the founders of the Internet didn’t develop protocols around personal identity. The original pioneers were scientists and engineers who developed the basic Internet protocols for purposes of research and sharing information. Personal identity was not their focus.
When I started my company, Evolver, back in 2007, we wanted to address this problem of identity by implementing technologies that were being developed back then, such as the Identity Commons. The idea was to flip the logic of the Internet: Each user would have a secure holder for their identity and personal data. They would be able to choose what parts of their identity they wanted to share with any company or organization – instead of corporations building “walled silos” to data-mine their user base. But the financial incentives supporting the current extractive model were too powerful to allow for alternatives.
With Proof of Humanity, you undergo a verification process designed to prove you are a human being, not a Bot or AI. Once you have successfully passed the registration process, you start to receive a regular Universal Basic Income (UBI). I am not sure exactly how the funds for the UBI are generated, but apparently it amounts to several hundred dollars per month. This is already making a major difference in the lives of old people in Latin America who are signing up for it. If Proof of Humanity is scalable, it could help to bring about a more egalitarian restructuring of society."
(https://danielpinchbeck.substack.com/p/crypto-criticism-part-two?)