DGML: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


"The  basic  features  of  DG-ML  are  based  on  the  conjunction  of  open  source  /  open  design production  logics  at  the  global  scale,  which  are  coupled  with  local-network  production  at  a regional  scale.  Traditionally  corporate  enterprises  have solely  owned  the  intellectual  property (IP)  they  employ  in  the  production  of  goods.  They  source  the  materials  for  the  goods  through national  or  global  supply  chains.  They  manufacture  those  goods  using  economies  of  scale  in  a set number of manufacturing centres, whereupon those finished goods are delivered nationally or  globally.  DG-ML  is  an  inversion  of  this  production  logic.  First  of  all,  the  IP  is  open,  whether open  source  or  creative  commons  or  copyfair,3  so  it  can  be  used  by  anyone.  Secondly, manufacturing  and  production  can  be  done  independently  of  the  IP,  by  any  community  or enterprise  around  the  world  that  wants  to.  The  democratization  of  increasingly  powerful precision  manufacturing  technologies,  such  as  3D  printers,  laser  cutters,  CNC  routers  and automated systems / robots potentiate this. This does not follow the logic of economies of scale (yet), rather it is focused on producing value for a critical reference group (CRG), a community who require such goods. Thirdly, distribution is localized to the CRG, or affiliates of the CRG."
"The  basic  features  of  DG-ML  are  based  on  the  conjunction  of  open  source  /  open  design production  logics  at  the  global  scale,  which  are  coupled  with  local-network  production  at  a regional  scale.  Traditionally  corporate  enterprises  have solely  owned  the  intellectual  property (IP)  they  employ  in  the  production  of  goods.  They  source  the  materials  for  the  goods  through national  or  global  supply  chains.  They  manufacture  those  goods  using  economies  of  scale  in  a set number of manufacturing centres, whereupon those finished goods are delivered nationally or  globally.  DG-ML  is  an  inversion  of  this  production  logic.  First  of  all,  the  IP  is  open,  whether open  source  or  creative  commons  or  copyfair,3  so  it  can  be  used  by  anyone.  Secondly, manufacturing  and  production  can  be  done  independently  of  the  IP,  by  any  community  or enterprise  around  the  world  that  wants  to.  The  democratization  of  increasingly  powerful precision  manufacturing  technologies,  such  as  3D  printers,  laser  cutters,  CNC  routers  and automated systems / robots potentiate this. This does not follow the logic of economies of scale (yet), rather it is focused on producing value for a critical reference group (CRG), a community who require such goods. Thirdly, distribution is localized to the CRG, or affiliates of the CRG."
(https://www.academia.edu/33661849/A_New_Model_of_Production_for_a_New_Economy)
=Discussion=
Chris Giotitsas and Jose Ramos:
"DG-ML  is  not  just  the  advent  of  new  technologies  that can  be  simply  strapped  on  to  the neoliberal    globalization    machine.    DG-ML    in    fact    represents    the    instantiation    and operationalization of a new economic system that draws from an emerging worldview. Drawing from  relationships  and  experiences  with  people  involved  in  DG-ML,  we  believe  it  represents  a substantive cultural shift in the orientation of material producers/consumers. It rejects the way  in which industrialization has decontextualized inputs and outputs and associated externalities. It is thus allied to the vision for building circular economies, the idea being that the production materials  used  in  a  DG-ML  process  are  sourced  as  locally  as  possible,  with  waste  outputs utilized  as  inputs  elsewhere,  eliminating  unnecessary supply  chain  associated  costs  and impacts.  It  is  also  connected  to  calls  for  a  post-growth  economic  model,  sustaining  livelihoods based  on  measures  of  wellbeing  rather  than  corporate  /  economic  growth.10  It  is  interwoven with  the  open  source  movement,  a  vision  for  a  digital commons  where  the  legacy  of  human creativity  is  shareable.  It  draws  from  a  planetary  imaginary  where  local  development  work  is responsive  to  the  planetary  challenges  we  face.11  It  is  in  fact  part  of  a  movement  to  create  an alternative  globalization,12  and  an  expression  of  an  emergent  worldview:  global  ecological integrity versus overshoot, peer worker solidarity versus national competition, value  pluralism versus the monoculture of GDP."
(https://www.academia.edu/33661849/A_New_Model_of_Production_for_a_New_Economy)




Line 41: Line 50:


* Report:  A [[New Model of Production for a New Economy]]. '''[https://www.academia.edu/33661849/A_New_Model_of_Production_for_a_New_Economy Two Cases of Agricultural Communities]'''. By Chris Giotitsas and Jose Ramos. New Economics Foundation, 2017
* Report:  A [[New Model of Production for a New Economy]]. '''[https://www.academia.edu/33661849/A_New_Model_of_Production_for_a_New_Economy Two Cases of Agricultural Communities]'''. By Chris Giotitsas and Jose Ramos. New Economics Foundation, 2017
=More Information=
* see the report: A [[New Model of Production for a New Economy]]. '''[https://www.academia.edu/33661849/A_New_Model_of_Production_for_a_New_Economy Two Cases of Agricultural Communities]'''. By Chris Giotitsas and Jose Ramos. New Economics Foundation, 2017






[[Category:Manufacturing]]
[[Category:Manufacturing]]

Revision as of 10:27, 1 July 2017

= also written as DG-ML, Cosmo-Localization


Description

Jose Ramos and Chris Giotitsas:

"The basic features of DG-ML are based on the conjunction of open source / open design production logics at the global scale, which are coupled with local-network production at a regional scale. Traditionally corporate enterprises have solely owned the intellectual property (IP) they employ in the production of goods. They source the materials for the goods through national or global supply chains. They manufacture those goods using economies of scale in a set number of manufacturing centres, whereupon those finished goods are delivered nationally or globally. DG-ML is an inversion of this production logic. First of all, the IP is open, whether open source or creative commons or copyfair,3 so it can be used by anyone. Secondly, manufacturing and production can be done independently of the IP, by any community or enterprise around the world that wants to. The democratization of increasingly powerful precision manufacturing technologies, such as 3D printers, laser cutters, CNC routers and automated systems / robots potentiate this. This does not follow the logic of economies of scale (yet), rather it is focused on producing value for a critical reference group (CRG), a community who require such goods. Thirdly, distribution is localized to the CRG, or affiliates of the CRG." (https://www.academia.edu/33661849/A_New_Model_of_Production_for_a_New_Economy)


Discussion

Chris Giotitsas and Jose Ramos:

"DG-ML is not just the advent of new technologies that can be simply strapped on to the neoliberal globalization machine. DG-ML in fact represents the instantiation and operationalization of a new economic system that draws from an emerging worldview. Drawing from relationships and experiences with people involved in DG-ML, we believe it represents a substantive cultural shift in the orientation of material producers/consumers. It rejects the way in which industrialization has decontextualized inputs and outputs and associated externalities. It is thus allied to the vision for building circular economies, the idea being that the production materials used in a DG-ML process are sourced as locally as possible, with waste outputs utilized as inputs elsewhere, eliminating unnecessary supply chain associated costs and impacts. It is also connected to calls for a post-growth economic model, sustaining livelihoods based on measures of wellbeing rather than corporate / economic growth.10 It is interwoven with the open source movement, a vision for a digital commons where the legacy of human creativity is shareable. It draws from a planetary imaginary where local development work is responsive to the planetary challenges we face.11 It is in fact part of a movement to create an alternative globalization,12 and an expression of an emergent worldview: global ecological integrity versus overshoot, peer worker solidarity versus national competition, value pluralism versus the monoculture of GDP." (https://www.academia.edu/33661849/A_New_Model_of_Production_for_a_New_Economy)


Examples

A

  • AbilityMate, a company that supports people with disabilities to design and manufacture their own prosthetics and assistive devices,
  • Atelier Paysan


F


O


R

  • RepRap, an open source organization that designs 3D printers designed to replicate themselves,


W

  • WikiHouse, a foundation which supports people to design and build sustainable housing,

More Information


More Information