Talk:Asynchronous Collaborative Music Recording: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(p2p collaborative audio wiki. seperate article?) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I eluded to p2p collaborative audio in the [[P2P Wiki/Decentralized Wikis]] article in the first paragraph. | I eluded to p2p collaborative audio in the [[P2P Wiki/Decentralized Wikis]] article in the first paragraph. | ||
I'd prefer the use of a p2p wiki for collaborative recording. Once the tech is here and integrated, you wouldn't be limited to asynchronous work; you can do realtime stuff too. | I'd prefer the use of a p2p wiki for collaborative recording. Once the tech is here and integrated, you wouldn't be limited to asynchronous work; you can do realtime stuff too. And that's among other benefits. | ||
Does this justify a seperate article? | Does this justify a seperate article? | ||
[[User:ChristopherAquilino|caquilino]] 01:53, 16 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
the more the merrier I would say, so use your own judgment ... in the past though, we have avoided to talk about projects and vaporware, so preferably, it refers to something already real | |||
--[[User:Mbauwens|MIchel Bauwens]] 14:55, 16 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:55, 16 July 2012
I eluded to p2p collaborative audio in the P2P Wiki/Decentralized Wikis article in the first paragraph.
I'd prefer the use of a p2p wiki for collaborative recording. Once the tech is here and integrated, you wouldn't be limited to asynchronous work; you can do realtime stuff too. And that's among other benefits.
Does this justify a seperate article? caquilino 01:53, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
the more the merrier I would say, so use your own judgment ... in the past though, we have avoided to talk about projects and vaporware, so preferably, it refers to something already real
--MIchel Bauwens 14:55, 16 July 2012 (UTC)