Anti-Authoritarianism - Philosophy: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"'''Antiauthoritarianism is a specifically philosophical thesis that says that people are not bound to any non-human authority''', be it God, Reality, or Reason.  In this sense, for example, Protestantism, in the West, was a step towards antiauthoritarianism because it located the House of God within each person, rather than a relation only attainable through a priest caste that had a special relation to God.  On the other side of this sea change, it forced authority to be reconstituted as something that was generated by humans’ interactions with each other (otherwise there would be something like theological anarchy)."  
"'''Anti-authoritarianism is a specifically philosophical thesis that says that people are not bound to any non-human authority''', be it God, Reality, or Reason.  In this sense, for example, Protestantism, in the West, was a step towards anti-authoritarianism because it located the House of God within each person, rather than a relation only attainable through a priest caste that had a special relation to God.  On the other side of this sea change, it forced authority to be reconstituted as something that was generated by humans’ interactions with each other (otherwise there would be something like theological anarchy)."  
(http://www.moq.org/forum/Kundert/pirsiginstitutionalized/pirsiginstitutionalized.html)
(http://www.moq.org/forum/Kundert/pirsiginstitutionalized/pirsiginstitutionalized.html)



Latest revision as of 08:26, 12 July 2008

"Anti-authoritarianism is a specifically philosophical thesis that says that people are not bound to any non-human authority, be it God, Reality, or Reason. In this sense, for example, Protestantism, in the West, was a step towards anti-authoritarianism because it located the House of God within each person, rather than a relation only attainable through a priest caste that had a special relation to God. On the other side of this sea change, it forced authority to be reconstituted as something that was generated by humans’ interactions with each other (otherwise there would be something like theological anarchy)." (http://www.moq.org/forum/Kundert/pirsiginstitutionalized/pirsiginstitutionalized.html)