Sociological Exploration of Crowdsourcing: Difference between revisions
(Created page with " '''* Paper: Mark N. Wexler, (2011) "Reconfiguring the sociology of the crowd: exploring Crowdsourcing", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 31 Iss: 1/...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''* Paper: Mark N. Wexler, (2011) "Reconfiguring the sociology of the crowd: exploring [[Crowdsourcing]]", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 31 Iss: 1/2, pp.6 - 20''' | '''* Paper: Mark N. Wexler, (2011) "Reconfiguring the sociology of the crowd: exploring [[Crowdsourcing]]", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 31 Iss: 1/2, pp.6 - 20''' | ||
| Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
[[Category:Articles]] | [[Category:Articles]] | ||
[[Category:Collaborative Economy]] | |||
Latest revision as of 08:15, 27 February 2012
* Paper: Mark N. Wexler, (2011) "Reconfiguring the sociology of the crowd: exploring Crowdsourcing", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 31 Iss: 1/2, pp.6 - 20
URL = http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1907199&show=abstract
Abstract
" The purpose of this paper is to examine the manner in which advocates of crowdsourcing reconfigure the classical sociological treatment of the crowd.
Design/methodology/approach – The approach taken conceives of the semantics of crowd theorizing in three phases, each of which makes sense of the power dynamics between the elite and the crowd. In phases one and two, the crowd is conceptualized as a problem generator; in phase three, the crowd is depicted as a problem solver and innovator.
Findings – This paper provides a critical look at phase three crowd theorizing. It explores how, by ignoring the disruptive power dynamic, crowdsourcing generates a credible image of the crowd as an innovator and problem solver. The work concludes with a discussion of the implications of phase three crowd theorizing for researchers in sociology.
Practical implications – Advocates of the wisdom of crowds, if interested in the sociological implications of their position, must attend to both the disruptive and costly implications of third phase crowd theorizing."