Rewards for Contributions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/05/rewarding_users_for_contributi.html | http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/05/rewarding_users_for_contributi.html | ||
[[Category:Contributive Economy]] | |||
[[Category:Business]] | |||
[[Category:Encyclopedia]] | [[Category:Encyclopedia]] | ||
[[Category:Governance]] | [[Category:Governance]] | ||
[[Category:Money]] | [[Category:Money]] | ||
Latest revision as of 05:17, 19 September 2024
Refers to the key issue of how to reward contributors in peer projects.
See also our entries on Revenue Sharing and Crowdfunding
Description
Generally, awards take the form of:
- Earned point systems (e.g. Yahoo! Answers)
- Explicit endorsements (e.g. linkedIn)
- Peer rating systems and levels (e.g. Karma on Slashdot)
- Prizes (e.g. threadless.com)
- Recognition (e.g. open source code candidacy)
(summary from 'Hopper' in the Cooperation Commons mailing list)
More Information
Interesting blog posting on the topic at http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/05/rewarding_users_for_contributi.html