Digital Person: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Book. The Digital Person. Technology and Privacy in the Information Age. Daniel Solove.'''


'''Book. The Digital Person. Daniel Solove.'''
URL = http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Digital-Person/text.htm


Many chapters available for download above.


=Description=
=Description=


"Daniel Solove suggests that privacy concerns that emerge in contemporary digital culture are not simply a matter of total surveillance by a malevolent overseer; instead, they are a matter of data disclosure to “objective” machines.  Each user builds for herself a “digital dossier,” personal data connected to an IP address or username, that can easily be recalled by a machine.  For instance, Amazon’s “recommend” feature, or YouTube’s personal statistics or private channels, or even automatic forms, are silently customized through everyday use.  In essence, the machine is watching our every move, recording it and then playing it back for us.  Solove argues that instead of looking to Orwell’s 1984 as a descriptive metaphor for digital surveillance, it is more accurate to look to Kafka’s The Trial.  We are being watched, but by whom and for what reason is unclear, even for those doing the watching.  If, in fact, privacy is no longer a matter of fortifying one's person, but controlling the mechanisms by which machine's understand persons, than how can "responsible" governments support citizen privacy while taking advantage of new digital tools?"
"Daniel Solove suggests that [[Privacy]] concerns that emerge in contemporary digital culture are not simply a matter of total surveillance by a malevolent overseer; instead, they are a matter of data disclosure to “objective” machines.  Each user builds for herself a “digital dossier,” personal data connected to an IP address or username, that can easily be recalled by a machine.  For instance, Amazon’s “recommend” feature, or YouTube’s personal statistics or private channels, or even automatic forms, are silently customized through everyday use.  In essence, the machine is watching our every move, recording it and then playing it back for us.  Solove argues that instead of looking to Orwell’s 1984 as a descriptive metaphor for digital surveillance, it is more accurate to look to Kafka’s The Trial.  We are being watched, but by whom and for what reason is unclear, even for those doing the watching.  If, in fact, privacy is no longer a matter of fortifying one's person, but controlling the mechanisms by which machine's understand persons, than how can "responsible" governments support citizen privacy while taking advantage of new digital tools?"
(remarks from Eric Gordon)
(remarks from Eric Gordon)



Latest revision as of 10:30, 1 April 2008

Book. The Digital Person. Technology and Privacy in the Information Age. Daniel Solove.

URL = http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Digital-Person/text.htm

Many chapters available for download above.

Description

"Daniel Solove suggests that Privacy concerns that emerge in contemporary digital culture are not simply a matter of total surveillance by a malevolent overseer; instead, they are a matter of data disclosure to “objective” machines. Each user builds for herself a “digital dossier,” personal data connected to an IP address or username, that can easily be recalled by a machine. For instance, Amazon’s “recommend” feature, or YouTube’s personal statistics or private channels, or even automatic forms, are silently customized through everyday use. In essence, the machine is watching our every move, recording it and then playing it back for us. Solove argues that instead of looking to Orwell’s 1984 as a descriptive metaphor for digital surveillance, it is more accurate to look to Kafka’s The Trial. We are being watched, but by whom and for what reason is unclear, even for those doing the watching. If, in fact, privacy is no longer a matter of fortifying one's person, but controlling the mechanisms by which machine's understand persons, than how can "responsible" governments support citizen privacy while taking advantage of new digital tools?" (remarks from Eric Gordon)