Aperspectivism: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We are copying this definition, very important to P2P Epistemology, from The Transitioner: | We are copying this definition, very important to P2P Epistemology, from The Transitioner: | ||
| Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
[[Category:Encyclopedia]] | [[Category:Encyclopedia]] | ||
[[Category:Education]] | |||
Revision as of 04:08, 1 March 2006
We are copying this definition, very important to P2P Epistemology, from The Transitioner:
URL = http://www.thetransitioner.org/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Aperspectivism
"Aperspectivism is a concept created by Jean Gebser in his book called « The Ever Present Origin ».
Let's imagine a circle of people around a complex colorful object. Depending on their position around this object, some people will say it's back with a flower hat. Others will say it has a pair of eyes. Others will mention its blue vaporous aspect, with no precise details, with a had without flowers, etc.
No one can individually grab the object in its plain reality, everyone has an « angled » perception, based upon the angle he/she is looking from. In the classical approach, named « perspectivism », each one would defend his/her point of view by claiming his/her own perception, fully sincere and valid..
No matter which process is used to select the dominant view (from the strongest, the most charismatic, the most agile, the elected representative...), the final version that will emerge will also have an angle.
The only way to apprehend the complex reality of this object is collective. Each one should be able to provide his/her point of view, just like providing a new piece in a giant puzzle. We no longer stick up for a point of view, but we offer it. Thus, while everyone has an individual perception that is absolutely sincere and contradictory, the community becomes able to manipulate a complex object that none of the member can individually grasp..
This approach seems obvious to us for real 3D objects that belong to our perceptible reality. Yet we leave this approach as soon as complex symbolic objects enter in the game. Then we jump into perspectivism, just like if the balance of contradictory forces would give birth to an emerging truth. This is one of the greatest contemporary illusions there is." (http://www.thetransitioner.org/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Aperspectivism)