Agreement-Based Organization: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''= "ABO 1.0 is the first community-building framework which fully supports our personal autonomy and the integrity of interpersonal agreements".''' | '''= "ABO 1.0 is the first community-building framework which fully supports our personal autonomy and the integrity of interpersonal agreements".''' | ||
Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
=Description= | == Description == | ||
'''1. Greg Cassel et al.:''' | |||
An "Agreement-based organization is '''an intentionally minimal framework of suggested protocols. It's a framework for generating bespoke or 'made-to-order' formal, consent-based relationships in all domains''': within groups, between groups, between individuals and groups, and peer-to-peer. It’s a framework for developing exploratory discussion and media-sharing networks, as well as objectives-driven economic agreements and commitments." | |||
([https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c_xWEIay-2jyJ3Rqb6OgTxoZBJfjNW4d6w6ukXyeJk4/edit]) | |||
Greg Cassel: | '''2. Greg Cassel:''' | ||
"As peer-to-peer technologies evolve, it seems increasingly urgent and feasible for humanity to move towards a norm of [[Consent-Based Relationships]]. We can incrementally re-imagine and rebuild patterns of behavior which have been dehumanized by ages of violence and centuries of commercially industrialized culture. We can undermine distorted fears and false scarcities, to co-create an information age which is rich in freedom and opportunities for all. Compared to [[Consent-Oriented Organizational Models]] such as [[Sociocracy]] and [[Holacracy]], ABO 1.0 is a deliberately minimal framework for generating consent-based agreements. I distinguish this developmental framework from suggested ‘recipes’ for community management, which can and IMO should be developed and explored both separately and together with this. | "As peer-to-peer technologies evolve, it seems increasingly urgent and feasible for humanity to move towards a norm of [[Consent-Based Relationships]]. We can incrementally re-imagine and rebuild patterns of behavior which have been dehumanized by ages of violence and centuries of commercially industrialized culture. We can undermine distorted fears and false scarcities, to co-create an information age which is rich in freedom and opportunities for all. Compared to [[Consent-Oriented Organizational Models]] such as [[Sociocracy]] and [[Holacracy]], ABO 1.0 is a deliberately minimal framework for generating consent-based agreements. I distinguish this developmental framework from suggested ‘recipes’ for community management, which can and IMO should be developed and explored both separately and together with this. | ||
Line 13: | Line 17: | ||
(https://medium.com/enspiral-tales/a-developmental-framework-for-agreement-based-organization-54298b128906#.tfilpcwat) | (https://medium.com/enspiral-tales/a-developmental-framework-for-agreement-based-organization-54298b128906#.tfilpcwat) | ||
=Characteristics= | == Characteristics == | ||
Greg Cassel: | Greg Cassel: | ||
"* All formal social structures are based on written agreements adopted by the direct consent of each agreement’s members. Agreements are created using the agree/disagree/abstain/block voting model as developed by Loomio for online use. | " | ||
* All formal social structures are based on written agreements adopted by the direct consent of each agreement’s members. Agreements are created using the agree/disagree/abstain/block voting model as developed by Loomio for online use. | |||
* Agreements of all sorts are supported, but the peer-based management of ‘agreement-based groups’ is stressed. For instance, practical standards are suggested for dealing with uncooperative members and emergency situations. | * Agreements of all sorts are supported, but the peer-based management of ‘agreement-based groups’ is stressed. For instance, practical standards are suggested for dealing with uncooperative members and emergency situations. | ||
* Privacy and permissions are fundamentally important. | * Privacy and permissions are fundamentally important. | ||
* Potential agreements are systematically related to creative and economic intentions including goals, processes, tasks, roles, events, standards, and budgets. Special consideration is given to sustainable collective budgeting. | * Potential agreements are systematically related to creative and economic intentions including goals, processes, tasks, roles, events, standards, and budgets. Special consideration is given to sustainable collective budgeting. | ||
* Special consideration is also given to the delegation of group tasks and roles, in the spirit of Jo Freeman’s extraordinarily forward-looking The Tyranny of Structurelessness. | * Special consideration is also given to the delegation of group tasks and roles, in the spirit of Jo Freeman’s extraordinarily forward-looking The Tyranny of Structurelessness. | ||
* Complexly-related agreements are suggested through modular design, hierarchy, federation, ‘intercommunity’ and distributed version control." | * Complexly-related agreements are suggested through modular design, hierarchy, federation, ‘intercommunity’ and distributed version control." | ||
(https://medium.com/enspiral-tales/a-developmental-framework-for-agreement-based-organization-54298b128906#.tfilpcwat) | (https://medium.com/enspiral-tales/a-developmental-framework-for-agreement-based-organization-54298b128906#.tfilpcwat) | ||
[[ | == More Information == | ||
* [[Agreements]] | |||
[[Category:Peergovernance]] | [[Category:Peergovernance]] | ||
[[Category:Open_Company_Formats]] | |||
[[Category: | [[Category:P2P_Law]] |
Latest revision as of 10:12, 14 November 2024
= "ABO 1.0 is the first community-building framework which fully supports our personal autonomy and the integrity of interpersonal agreements".
URL = [1]
Description
1. Greg Cassel et al.:
An "Agreement-based organization is an intentionally minimal framework of suggested protocols. It's a framework for generating bespoke or 'made-to-order' formal, consent-based relationships in all domains: within groups, between groups, between individuals and groups, and peer-to-peer. It’s a framework for developing exploratory discussion and media-sharing networks, as well as objectives-driven economic agreements and commitments." ([2])
2. Greg Cassel:
"As peer-to-peer technologies evolve, it seems increasingly urgent and feasible for humanity to move towards a norm of Consent-Based Relationships. We can incrementally re-imagine and rebuild patterns of behavior which have been dehumanized by ages of violence and centuries of commercially industrialized culture. We can undermine distorted fears and false scarcities, to co-create an information age which is rich in freedom and opportunities for all. Compared to Consent-Oriented Organizational Models such as Sociocracy and Holacracy, ABO 1.0 is a deliberately minimal framework for generating consent-based agreements. I distinguish this developmental framework from suggested ‘recipes’ for community management, which can and IMO should be developed and explored both separately and together with this. ABO 1.0 is a conceptually dense thirteen page document." (https://medium.com/enspiral-tales/a-developmental-framework-for-agreement-based-organization-54298b128906#.tfilpcwat)
Characteristics
Greg Cassel:
"
- All formal social structures are based on written agreements adopted by the direct consent of each agreement’s members. Agreements are created using the agree/disagree/abstain/block voting model as developed by Loomio for online use.
- Agreements of all sorts are supported, but the peer-based management of ‘agreement-based groups’ is stressed. For instance, practical standards are suggested for dealing with uncooperative members and emergency situations.
- Privacy and permissions are fundamentally important.
- Potential agreements are systematically related to creative and economic intentions including goals, processes, tasks, roles, events, standards, and budgets. Special consideration is given to sustainable collective budgeting.
- Special consideration is also given to the delegation of group tasks and roles, in the spirit of Jo Freeman’s extraordinarily forward-looking The Tyranny of Structurelessness.
- Complexly-related agreements are suggested through modular design, hierarchy, federation, ‘intercommunity’ and distributed version control."