Transitioning from Industrial Agriculture to Diversified Agroecological Systems: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " '''* Report: IPES-Food. 2016. From uniformity to diversity: a paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. International Panel of Experts...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''* Report: IPES-Food. 2016. From uniformity to diversity: a paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food systems.'''
'''* Report: IPES-Food. 2016. From uniformity to diversity: a paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food systems.'''


URL = http://www.ipes-food.org ([http://www.ipes-food.org/images/Reports/UniformityToDiversity_FullReport.pdf pdd])
URL = http://www.ipes-food.org ([http://www.ipes-food.org/images/Reports/UniformityToDiversity_FullReport.pdf pdd])


=Key messages=
== Key messages ==
 
* "Today’s food and farming systems have succeeded in supplying large volumes of foods
to global markets, but are generating negative outcomes on multiple fronts: widespread
degradation of land, water and ecosystems; high GHG emissions; biodiversity
losses; persistent hunger and micro-nutrient deficiencies alongside the rapid rise of
obesity and diet-related diseases; and livelihood stresses for farmers around the world.
 
* Many of these problems are linked specifically to ‘industrial agriculture’: the input-intensive
crop monocultures and industrial-scale feedlots that now dominate farming
landscapes. The uniformity at the heart of these systems, and their reliance on chemical
fertilizers, pesticides and preventive use of antibiotics, leads systematically to negative
outcomes and vulnerabilities.
 
* Industrial agriculture and the ‘industrial food systems’ that have developed around it
are locked in place by a series of vicious cycles. For example, the way food systems are
currently structured allows value to accrue to a limited number of actors, reinforcing
their economic and political power, and thus their ability to influence the governance
of food systems.


* Tweaking practices can improve some of the specific outcomes of industrial agriculture,
* "Today’s food and farming systems have succeeded in supplying large volumes of foods to global markets, but are generating negative outcomes on multiple fronts: widespread degradation of land, water and ecosystems; high GHG emissions; biodiversity losses; persistent hunger and micro-nutrient deficiencies alongside the rapid rise of obesity and diet-related diseases; and livelihood stresses for farmers around the world.
but will not provide long-term solutions to the multiple problems it generates.
* Many of these problems are linked specifically to ‘industrial agriculture’: the input-intensive crop monocultures and industrial-scale feedlots that now dominate farming landscapes. The uniformity at the heart of these systems, and their reliance on chemical fertilizers, pesticides and preventive use of antibiotics, leads systematically to negative outcomes and vulnerabilities.
* Industrial agriculture and the ‘industrial food systems’ that have developed around it are locked in place by a series of vicious cycles. For example, the way food systems are currently structured allows value to accrue to a limited number of actors, reinforcing their economic and political power, and thus their ability to influence the governance of food systems.
* Tweaking practices can improve some of the specific outcomes of industrial agriculture, but will not provide long-term solutions to the multiple problems it generates.
* What is required is a fundamentally different model of agriculture based on diversifying farms and farming landscapes, replacing chemical inputs, optimizing biodiversity and stimulating interactions between different species, as part of holistic strategies to build long-term fertility, healthy agro-ecosystems and secure livelihoods, i.e. ‘diversified agroecological systems’.
* There is growing evidence that these systems keep carbon in the ground, support biodiversity, rebuild soil fertility and sustain yields over time, providing a basis for secure farm livelihoods.
* Data shows that these systems can compete with industrial agriculture in terms of total outputs, performing particularly strongly under environmental stress, and delivering production increases in the places where additional food is desperately needed. Diversified agroecological systems can also pave the way for diverse diets and improved health.  Change is already happening. Industrial food systems are being challenged on multiple fronts, from new forms of cooperation and knowledge-creation to the development of new market relationships that bypass conventional retail circuits.
* Political incentives must be shifted in order for these alternatives to emerge beyond the margins. A series of modest steps can collectively shift the centre of gravity in food systems."


* What is required is a fundamentally different model of agriculture based on diversifying
farms and farming landscapes, replacing chemical inputs, optimizing biodiversity
and stimulating interactions between different species, as part of holistic strategies to
build long-term fertility, healthy agro-ecosystems and secure livelihoods, i.e. ‘diversified
agroecological systems’.
* There is growing evidence that these systems keep carbon in the ground, support biodiversity,
rebuild soil fertility and sustain yields over time, providing a basis for secure
farm livelihoods.
* Data shows that these systems can compete with industrial agriculture in terms of total
outputs, performing particularly strongly under environmental stress, and delivering
production increases in the places where additional food is desperately needed. Diversified
agroecological systems can also pave the way for diverse diets and improved health.
Change is already happening. Industrial food systems are being challenged on multiple
fronts, from new forms of cooperation and knowledge-creation to the development of
new market relationships that bypass conventional retail circuits.
* Political incentives must be shifted in order for these alternatives to emerge beyond
the margins. A series of modest steps can collectively shift the centre of gravity in food
systems."
(http://www.ipes-food.org/images/Reports/UniformityToDiversity_FullReport.pdf)
(http://www.ipes-food.org/images/Reports/UniformityToDiversity_FullReport.pdf)


[[Category:Agrifood]]
[[Category:Agrifood]]
 
[[Category:Policy]]
[[Category:Articles]]
[[Category:Articles]]
[[Category:Policy]]

Revision as of 10:16, 2 May 2024

* Report: IPES-Food. 2016. From uniformity to diversity: a paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food systems.

URL = http://www.ipes-food.org (pdd)

Key messages

  • "Today’s food and farming systems have succeeded in supplying large volumes of foods to global markets, but are generating negative outcomes on multiple fronts: widespread degradation of land, water and ecosystems; high GHG emissions; biodiversity losses; persistent hunger and micro-nutrient deficiencies alongside the rapid rise of obesity and diet-related diseases; and livelihood stresses for farmers around the world.
  • Many of these problems are linked specifically to ‘industrial agriculture’: the input-intensive crop monocultures and industrial-scale feedlots that now dominate farming landscapes. The uniformity at the heart of these systems, and their reliance on chemical fertilizers, pesticides and preventive use of antibiotics, leads systematically to negative outcomes and vulnerabilities.
  • Industrial agriculture and the ‘industrial food systems’ that have developed around it are locked in place by a series of vicious cycles. For example, the way food systems are currently structured allows value to accrue to a limited number of actors, reinforcing their economic and political power, and thus their ability to influence the governance of food systems.
  • Tweaking practices can improve some of the specific outcomes of industrial agriculture, but will not provide long-term solutions to the multiple problems it generates.
  • What is required is a fundamentally different model of agriculture based on diversifying farms and farming landscapes, replacing chemical inputs, optimizing biodiversity and stimulating interactions between different species, as part of holistic strategies to build long-term fertility, healthy agro-ecosystems and secure livelihoods, i.e. ‘diversified agroecological systems’.
  • There is growing evidence that these systems keep carbon in the ground, support biodiversity, rebuild soil fertility and sustain yields over time, providing a basis for secure farm livelihoods.
  • Data shows that these systems can compete with industrial agriculture in terms of total outputs, performing particularly strongly under environmental stress, and delivering production increases in the places where additional food is desperately needed. Diversified agroecological systems can also pave the way for diverse diets and improved health. Change is already happening. Industrial food systems are being challenged on multiple fronts, from new forms of cooperation and knowledge-creation to the development of new market relationships that bypass conventional retail circuits.
  • Political incentives must be shifted in order for these alternatives to emerge beyond the margins. A series of modest steps can collectively shift the centre of gravity in food systems."

(http://www.ipes-food.org/images/Reports/UniformityToDiversity_FullReport.pdf)