Category talk:Peerproperty: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Same here -- why '''include''' the category Peerproperty in the other categories Peerproduction and Peergovernance??? This would look much easier to me if we could remove the...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
to join the [[Peer Property]] page, and cross link between [[Peer Property]], [[Peer Governance]] and [[Peer Production]] pages. | to join the [[Peer Property]] page, and cross link between [[Peer Property]], [[Peer Governance]] and [[Peer Production]] pages. | ||
[[User:Asimong|Simon Grant]] ([[User talk:Asimong|talk]]) 00:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC) | [[User:Asimong|Simon Grant]] ([[User talk:Asimong|talk]]) 00:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
** | |||
not sure what you mean by include, they are 3 independent but interlinked categories; agreed that the category pages should have been titled differently but I guess it is too late for this; otherwise, same rule as everywhere else, there is a category, and there is are topical pages, not to be confused | |||
so, I'm not sure about what you are proposing here; and remember, the section intro pages should not go to the topical page but to a newly created intro page, as suggested elsewhere | |||
--[[User:Mbauwens|MIchel Bauwens]] ([[User talk:Mbauwens|talk]]) 19:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:06, 14 February 2017
Same here -- why include the category Peerproperty in the other categories Peerproduction and Peergovernance???
This would look much easier to me if we could remove the categories; move the explanatory / introductory material to join the Peer Property page, and cross link between Peer Property, Peer Governance and Peer Production pages.
Simon Grant (talk) 00:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
not sure what you mean by include, they are 3 independent but interlinked categories; agreed that the category pages should have been titled differently but I guess it is too late for this; otherwise, same rule as everywhere else, there is a category, and there is are topical pages, not to be confused
so, I'm not sure about what you are proposing here; and remember, the section intro pages should not go to the topical page but to a newly created intro page, as suggested elsewhere
--MIchel Bauwens (talk) 19:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)