User talk:Dante/C
... hmm ... although I might not be an expert , in relation to this thread , I just realize its interesting to situate our communication midst understanding of
... semantics ( ? )
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantics
... pragmatics ( ? )
"Related to semantics is the field of pragmatics, which studies the practical use of signs by agents or communities of interpretation within particular circumstances and contexts "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatics
" ... The ability to understand another speaker's intended meaning is called pragmatic competence. "
... Meta-Pragmatics ( ? )
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metapragmatics
" In anthropology, describing the rules of use for metapragmatic speech (in the same way that a grammar would describe the rules of use for 'ordinary' or semantic speech) is important because it can aid the understanding and analysis of a culture's linguistic ideology. "
I guess we do not yet have a language that allows for visualizing the specific definitions of each concept and meaning we want to express or build on. We often get lost in our own interpretations of semantics , or in redefining continually within a group what we might mean by a certain word , and according to the context.
The p2p foundation wiki might be useful in collecting and positioning different views and definitions.
Yet I feel it does not yet facilitate building with simple complexity.
I feel a positioning of relations , post symbolic language can emerge soon.
I would be happy to work on this with anyone interested.
I imagine a dynamic positioning of concepts relational base software.
I m not fully sure about the details to technically build up such a tool for a language of languages.
I imagine , as hypothesis , that with such a positioning of relations tool we could see the conceptual object and its relations to all other conceptual objects , at various levels of abstractions , directly on a screen , or in a 3d hologram navigation , while being able to add , compare , or build on everyones languages , not only from different cultures and spoken languages , but the different interpretation of every word according to the relations every person might make from it ,
and based on this , it becomes easier to compare and build on our differences , and create even more value , through difference ( as difference opens up new opportunities for relations )
while also having a medium / new kind of support to visualize and build on infinite levels of abstractions.
In the way I visualize it in head , it seems that on such a tool any concept , process , ... can be related between each other , in some ways like a big mind map , but a completely flexible mind map , that allows for multiple levels of abstraction ( for example , being able to use one relation between objects , as an object itself but at level of abstraction +1 , ... )
I ve been researching projects or ideas that might relate to such intention ,or could be used and inspire such a tool.
The list of links is availble under tags such as http://del.icio.us/deliciousdante/ReferenceMaps or http://del.icio.us/deliciousdante/visualization
for example , There are some softwares such as
but its not yet completely the kind of tool for a meta-cortex that I imagine.
For every dynamic object to be able to see each other , I imagine there to be some kind of gravity - some links in relation to quantum gravity can also be found on http://del.icio.us/deliciousdante/ReferenceMaps
I also like to imagine the combination of such a meta-cortex tool / dynamic positioning or relations at various levels of abstraction ,
with a process dimensions engine software , for which details can be found on http://oikoumene.coforum.net/processdimensions
I also guess cooperation could be possible with research departments in the field of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_visualization
I ve already mentionned such perspective with some of you ,
and for those with which I did not share it with yet ,
If you know any related projects , feel free to let me know.
If you are interested in this topic , please lets get in touch.
I believe such kind of tool , such kind of meta language , or new form of writing ,
has the capacity to build beyond , yet integrate , all writing systems currently used and used throughout history - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Writing_system - including syllabic and alphabetic , logographic , ... - , while also integrating all different meanings of words according to their contexts , throughout history ( as any kind of visualization option , including historical and other contextual projections could be chosen )
When enough objects / concepts , ... relations at various levels of abstraction are added , even when the sets of relations made would still be in formation , by leaving it open for editing to everyone , and by allowing further emergence through networking relational data bases ,
we will be able to visualize clouds , according to the perspective of visualization chosen , of various meaning dimensions.
Meaning Dimensions , at the ability to create new relations collaboratively based on their visualization , will allow a whole new path for communication , beyond verbal language , yet also integrating verbal language , written communication , of any language , any culture , any individual , any context , ...
Greetings
Dante