Protocol Sovereignty

Definition

Max Song:

"Protocol sovereignty refers to the concept where a blockchain operates as a sovereign entity, analogous to a nation-state, based on the principles of Westphalian sovereignty. This idea positions blockchain networks as self-governing systems that establish their own rules, protocols, and governance structures, independent of external authorities.

...

Protocol sovereignty redefines the landscape of digital governance and economic systems, positioning blockchains as autonomous entities capable of self-regulation and development. This concept challenges traditional notions of authority and governance, paving the way for innovative models of digital interaction and community building."

([1])

Key Characteristics

Max Song:

Territorial Integrity

- "Similar to nation-states that control their geographic boundaries, a blockchain secures its "territory" through cryptographic mechanisms. This ensures that no external entity can alter the state of the blockchain without consensus.

Self-Governance

- Protocols are governed by their own set of rules, which are agreed upon by network participants. Governance mechanisms, such as on-chain voting or decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), provide a framework for decision-making.

Non-Interference

- Just as Westphalian sovereignty emphasizes the principle of non-interference in domestic affairs, protocol sovereignty allows blockchains to operate without external intervention. This means that external governments or organizations cannot dictate the operations or changes within the blockchain.

Recognition and Legitimacy

- For a blockchain to be considered sovereign, there must be a recognition of its legitimacy by its users and possibly by external entities. This mirrors how nations seek recognition from other states to solidify their status.

Cultural Identity

- Each blockchain can cultivate its own community and culture, akin to national identity. This includes unique values, norms, and practices that define the user experience and governance."

([2])