Perceptions of Police Violence Across the Political Spectrum in the US

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search

* Report: How Informed are Americans about Race and Policing? McCaffree, K. & Saide, A. Research Report: Sceptic Research Center, CUPES-007 | February 20, 2021

URL = https://www.skeptic.com/research-center/reports/Research-Report-CUPES-007.pdf

Data Source: Civil Unrest and Presidential Election Study (“CUPES,” collected in September/October 2020)


Description

"This is the seventh report from the Civil Unrest and Presidential Election Study (CUPES). In this report, we investigate a complex and defining issue of 2020 (and, no doubt, many years ahead): race and policing. Amidst calls to “defund” and reform police agencies, informed understandings of police-citizen interactions are crucial. So, here we ask the question: across the political spectrum, how knowledgeable are people when it comes to the available data on fatal police shootings of Black Americans?"

(https://www.skeptic.com/research-center/reports/Research-Report-CUPES-007.pdf)


Findings

"The available data on police shootings of unarmed Black men is incomplete; however, existing data indicate that somewhere between 13-27 unarmed black men were killed by police in 2019. Adjusted for the number of law enforcement agencies that have yet to provide data, this number may be higher, perhaps between 60-100.

• Yet, over half (53.5%) of those reporting “very liberal” political views estimated that 1,000 or more unarmed Black men were killed, a likely error of at least an order of magnitude.

2. The available data suggest that 24.9% of people killed by police in 2019 were Black. However, across the political spectrum, survey participants overestimated this number.

• Those who reported being “liberal” or “very liberal” were particularly inaccurate, estimating the proportion to be 56% and 60%, respectively.


Take-home Messages

1. Our overall findings indicate that people are uninformed regarding the available data on fatal police shootings in the US.

2. Specifically, we found that the more people reported being “liberal” or “very liberal” on social and fiscal matters, the greater the discrepancy between the available data and their estimations."

(https://www.skeptic.com/research-center/reports/Research-Report-CUPES-007.pdf)

More information