Chinese Industrial Party

From P2P Foundation Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Description

Chor Pharn:

"The Chinese Industrial Party was never a party in the formal sense. It was a tendency, a milieu, a style of seriousness. Engineers, STEM graduates, military enthusiasts, online political obsessives, readers and writers who believed that the deepest questions of politics were not representation in the liberal sense, nor authenticity in the romantic sense, but productive forces, state capacity, organizational rationality, and the fit between civilisation and industry. The fantasy object that gathered this tendency was not a campaign but a novel: Lingao, with its time-travellers reconstructing an industrial order from scratch. The fantasy was telling. What it desired was not merely power. It desired a political architecture commensurate with production, a superstructure worthy of the forces it claimed to carry.

That complaint was legible, almost classical. China had advanced materially. Its industrial and technical strata had thickened. Yet the people who felt themselves to represent advanced productive capacity still experienced the political order as lagging, opaque, unworthy, or at least insufficiently modifiable. Behind the confidence in material progress sat a grievance: that the civilisation could build, but could not yet fully describe or reorder the power structure under which it built. Nationalism, in this setting, was not the essence of the project so much as its natural adhesive. A class in formation reached for the language nearest at hand to cohere itself. History still felt heavy. The state still felt like the proper object of argument. The future still seemed engineerable.

Even where the Chinese Industrial Party hardened into arrogance, or justified forms of elite rule that were colder than its admirers cared to admit, it remained historical in a deep sense. It believed that a society could be remade to match the productive forces emerging within it. It was severe, sometimes chillingly so, but it was not post-historical. It still imagined the problem as one of fit: between industry and governance, capability and political form, civilisation and administration."

(https://thecuttingfloor.substack.com/p/trump-tech-tribe)