Digital Activism Decoded
Book: Digital Activism Decoded. Ed. by Mary Joyce. Idebate Press, 2010
URL = http://meta-activism.org/book/
Description
"Citizens around the world are using digital technologies to push for social and political change. Yet, while stories have been published, discussed, extolled, and derided, the underlying mechanics of digital activism are little understood. This new field, its dynamics, practices, misconceptions, and possible futures are presented together for the first time in Digital Activism Decoded."
Table of Contents
Preface….. by Mary Joyce
Introduction: How to Think About Digital Activism….. by Mary Joyce
Part 1: Contexts: The Digital Activism Environment
- Infrastructure: Its Transformations and Effect on Digital Activism….. by Trebor Scholz
- Applications: Picking the Right One in a Transient World….. by Dan Schultz and Andreas Jungherr
- Devices: The Power of Mobile Phones….. by Brannon Cullum
- Economic and Social Factors: The Digital (Activism) Divide….. by Katharine Brodock
- Political Factors: Digital Activism in Closed and Open Societies….. by Tom Glaisyer
Part 2: Practices: Digital Actions in the Aggregate
- Activism Transforms Digital: The Social Movement Perspective….. by Anastasia Kavada
- Digital Transforms Activism: The Web Ecology Perspective….. by Tim Hwang
- Destructive Activism: The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Tactics….. by Steven Murdoch
Part 3: Effects: What Is Digital Activism’s Value?
- Measuring the Success of Digital Campaigns….. by Dave Karpf
- The New Casualties: Prisons and Persecution….. by Simon Columbus
- Digital Politics as Usual….. by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
- The Future of Advocacy in a Networked Age….. by Sem Devillart and Brian Waniewski
Excerpts
How Activists Coordinate Online
Today’s excerpt is the first from the second section of the book, which addresses the practices of digital activism. This excerpt, by post-doctoral fellow Anastasia Kavada, explains digital activism through the lens of social movement theory.
Anastasia Kavada:
"The Internet further helps activists to organize and make decisions. It facilitates processes of affiliation, allowing people to become members of the movement simply by subscribing to an email list or joining a Facebook group. Social movements have traditionally operated with an informal definition of membership. The ease with which activists can now join a protest network renders the process of affiliation even more fluid and flexible.
Online tools also aid collaboration, coordination, and the division of responsibilities among activists organizing a protest or campaign. Activists can use Wikipages to write to-do lists and messages of mobilization collaboratively. They can also employ calendar-matching services to plan meetings and gatherings. Interactive applications such as email, discussion groups, and instant messaging (and increasingly Internet telephony like Skype) can be used for decision making. Such collaboration can also be carried out through e-voting tools and other applications designed for aggregating preferences.
To meet their needs of coordination, social movements have also started to create their own Web platforms instead of using already existing ones that can only partly fulfill their needs. The European Social Forum launched such a platform in November 2007. Called OpenESF (www.openesf.net), the platform facilitates networking around common campaigns and initiatives by inviting registered users to create a profile and set up a project. These can refer to the preparation of the European Social Forum or to any proposal for social transformation as long as it conforms to the Charter of Principles of the World Social Forum. Projects are provided with a set of coordination tools including blogs, discussion lists, Wikipages, and task lists. As of August 2009, OpenESF had 970 registered members and 199 projects.
Spanning geographic boundaries, the Internet plays a vital role in coordinating protests across national borders. Still, activists often combine online tools with physical meetings, particularly for decisions that require lengthy discussion or negotiation among numerous participants.
For instance, while Indymedia activists organize on the international level through email lists, instant messaging, and the Indymedia Twiki, local Indymedia groups also meet regularly face-to-face. The same mix of online and offline coordination is present in the European Social Forum, where activists employ both email lists and physical meetings in the process of decision making.
Movements organizing online face greater risks of surveillance and suppression. Tweets, Facebook groups, websites, and blogs are all available in the public domain. Thus, the same Internet tools that help social movements to keep track of their opponents’ activities can also be used against them. For instance, during the 2009 G20 summit, the commander responsible for policing the protests admitted that the authorities were monitoring social networking sites. In an article published on BBC News Online, he said that such sites helped the police to assess the number of demonstrators expected in the streets and to get a sense of the activities being planned." (http://meta-activism.org/2010/05/from-our-book-how-activists-coordinate-online/)
Conclusion: Building the Future of Digital Activism….. by Mary Joyce