User talk:Asimong

hi,

you will have noticed a few redirects re the titles ...

this is because our wiki has some prior rules coming out of ten years of practice and to maintain some integrity in the formats

1) title are one phrase and as descriptive as possible (so no double phrase titles etc .. also better to avoid titles that have no autonomous meeting ... VoC Contributors is unlikely to have a meaning for those not knowing the specific document

2) titles take no article, all caps for verbs and nouncs but not for intermediate articles

thanks a lot for all the additions,

I suppose in this case, you will fill in the entries with copied contents from the full version ?

Michel --MIchel Bauwens (talk) 06:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

(Note: the articles in question are from Vocabulary of Commons)

Hi Michel — normally I would agree with you. Indeed, as you have seen I am quite positive about integrity through sticking to conventions, norms, standards, provided that they are managed collaboratively with proper peer-to-peer governance.

However, in this instance I was thinking quite carefully about the page names, and came to the conclusion that, in my view, it would be right and proper in this instance to use the verbatim title of the papers themselves, because these are not articles about something, they are the actual articles themselves.

Could we discuss further? Thanks Simon Grant (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)