Talk:P2P Companion Concepts
Alex,
I propose 2 steps:
1) once I finished the a to z selection, we have some voting mechanisms to filter out key concepts, let's say max 50 ...
2) we then organize them in your proposed AQAL structure, IF I/we can find help for such visiualization ...
--Mbauwens 05:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Wow, this page is really growing. I am beginning to feel the need for caution and order. I am wondering how we might use integral theory to see our way through this to a collection or collection of concepts that is approachable, and allows us to edit with a methodology.
This image that Michel made long ago uses some integral theory for grouping. http://p2pfoundation.net/images/P2PBusinessVisualization1.jpg
Integral theory was also used in his seminal book on P2P http://integralvisioning.org/article.php?story=p2ptheory1
An intro to integral theory can be found here. http://integrallife.com/learn/overview/essential-introduction-integral-approach
I find it to be the biggest map out there, but perhaps you have another in mind.
An easy was to say it is:
- Mind, Life, Matter
- I, We, It/Its
- The True, the Good, the Beautiful
So the organization starts to look like:
- Concepts on personal reality (Mind, I, True)
- How we are together (Life, We, Good)
- The way of Things (Matter, It/Its, The Beautiful)
Integral theory also has levels. One of the tricks of this is "Aperspectivism," a sort of requirement to view each concept from every level. --Alex Rollin 09:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)