Appropriate Technology: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
* Tends to support large centralised rather than decentralised | * Tends to support large centralised rather than decentralised | ||
* Decentralised tend to have a high cost of ownership and be based on personal commitment to environment rather than economics. | * Decentralised tend to have a high cost of ownership and be based on personal commitment to environment rather than economics. | ||
|} | |||
Within these schools there are also two approaches to licensing which I find are also important. I'm working on a third option (Humanitarian Licenses) which I will write up on another occasion | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
|Open Source | |||
||Marcin, | |||
Chris Watkins (Appropedia) | |||
|| | |||
* Makes it easier for people to build for themselves | |||
* Allows for people to build on each other's design | |||
* Almost impossible to raise investment, as hard to generate a return. | |||
* Improvement is incremental because of above | |||
* Often designs aren't finished to the point where others less technical can use them. | |||
|- | |||
|Proprietrary | |||
||UES | |||
Sunvention | |||
|| | |||
* Raise investment to develop large improvements to technology | |||
* Don't allow others to build and adapt on the technology. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Humanitarian | ||
||Natural Innovation's Humanitarian License | |||
||* Proprietrary in the west, but free license in developing countries. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 16:56, 29 September 2013
Description
From wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appropriate_technology
“Appropriate technology (AT) is technology that is designed with special consideration to the environmental, ethical, cultural, social and economical aspects of the community it is intended for. With these goals in mind, AT typically requires fewer resources, is easier to maintain, has a lower overall cost and less of an impact on the environment compared to industrialized practices.[1]
In developing nations, the term is usually used to describe simple technologies suitable for use in developing nations or less developed rural areas of industrialized nations. This form of appropriate technology usually prefers labor-intensive solutions over capital-intensive ones, although labor-saving devices are also used where this does not mean high capital or maintenance cost. In industrialized nations, the term appropriate technology often refers to engineering that takes special consideration of its social and environmental ramifications.“
The type of appropriate technology most closely tied to the P2P movement is Open Source Appropriate Technology.
| School | People | Notes, Challenges & Critiques |
|---|---|---|
| Collapse Peak Oil (usually Western) | Marcin Post Carbon Institute Some transitioners |
|
| Customise and Adapt (Developing World & Hobbyist) | Steven Lee (x AIDG) Catapult Most hobbyists Mouhsine Serrar & most Stove |
|
| Base of the Pyramid | Paul Polak IDE Martin Fisher - Kickstart |
|
| Scale | Mitra - Natural Innovation |
|
| Western cleantech | Cleantech Forum |
|
Within these schools there are also two approaches to licensing which I find are also important. I'm working on a third option (Humanitarian Licenses) which I will write up on another occasion
| Open Source | Marcin,
Chris Watkins (Appropedia) |
|
| Proprietrary | UES
Sunvention |
|
| Humanitarian | Natural Innovation's Humanitarian License | * Proprietrary in the west, but free license in developing countries. |
More Information
Appropedia (homepage) is an appropriate technology wiki with lots of useful documentation on low-tech and sustainable solutions. See the [http://www.appropedia.org/Portal:Appropriate_technology Appropriate Technology Portal.