Talk:Creating Sustainable Societies: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "version before replacement: '''* Book: Creating Sustainable Societies. The Rebirth of Democracy and Local Economies. John Boik. CreateSpace, 2012.''' URL = http://www.CreatingS...")
 
(Blanked the page)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
version before replacement:


'''* Book: Creating Sustainable Societies. The Rebirth of Democracy and Local Economies. John Boik. CreateSpace, 2012.'''
URL = http://www.CreatingSustainableSocieties.com
=Description=
"the Principled Societies concept outlined in the book offers a new "operating system" for society.  It is a blueprint for sustainable financial, economic, and governance systems, intended for local implementation.  Among the many characteristics, it offers a new funding approach to raise donations for nonprofits, schools, and even local governments.  And it offers a funding system to raise capital for a new generation of socially responsible corporations."
Wolfgang HoescheleL
"If we are to attain social and environmental sustainability, and an economy
that fosters trust and cooperation, we need new approaches. This book
provides reasoned proposals that synthesize aspects of social
entrepreneurship, peer-to-peer practices, participatory governance, and
solidarity economics. Its models for building new institutions for
sustainability deserve to be read and widely discussed."
=Excerpts=
Foreword by Bernard Lietaer:
"In a now-famous letter to James Madison in 1787, Thomas
Jefferson mused on various types of societies and concluded that
a government “wherein the will of everyone has a just influence”
provides the greatest liberty and happiness.1 But, he warned,
like societies with no governance and those under tyrants, “It has
its evils, too: the principal of which is the turbulence to which it
is subject.”
Jefferson was alluding to a rebellion in Massachusetts in support
of RevolutionaryWar veterans who had not yet received military
pay but were being sent to debtors’ prisons for unpaid taxes.
Such rebellions, he claimed, were the price of freedom. “Even
this evil is productive of good. It prevents the degeneracy of
government, and nourishes a general attention to the public
affairs. I hold that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing
and as necessary to the political world as storms in the physical,”
he wrote. “It is a medicine necessary for the sound health of
government.”
Creating Sustainable Societies proposes a blueprint, not for rebellion,
but for revolution—a revolution of ideas that could result
in sound governance and financial and ecological sustainability.
The book describes a systemic “medicine” and offers a plan for
organizing and coordinating action to bring about improvement
in our communities. This is compassion in action, not violence,
and the entire legal framework for undertaking this “revolution”
already exists. It does not rely on or even call for the passage of
new laws.
I have spent the past 30 years studying monetary systems, both
conventional and innovative. During this time, I have written
more than a dozen books, have spoken to thousands of audiences
around the world, and have taught in half a dozen universities in
the United States and Europe. Everywhere, I find dissatisfaction
and hunger for a breakthrough to another way of working, of
cooperating, of contributing. People are eager for change and
are awake to the need for change, even if most public officials,
constrained by politics or timidity, appear incapable of rising to
the challenges of our time.
In distilling the results of my investigations, I arrived at the sad
conclusion that the missing piece in all our monetary arrangements
is appropriate governance. This is true for both the official
money system (the Federal Reserve and all other central banks
in the world) and innovative systems of complementary currencies.
This missing piece is what John Boik brings to the table.
At first glance, his proposal might appear to center on a complementary
currency system, but more accurately it centers on
appropriate governance. On the one hand, it proposes a means
for collaborative direct democracy as applied to finance, corporate
behavior, and social organization: the “Principled Society.”
On the other, the very mechanics of the proposed monetary and
corporate model, including its transparency, are a manifestation
of democratic ideals.
Money is what most economists call a common good, i.e., a good
that people cannot be excluded from using. It falls into the same
category as clean air and fresh water. The modern world hasn’t
been very good at dealing with common goods. They have
tended either to be privatized or left to take care of themselves.
Both approaches leave common goods vulnerable to exploitation.
In the case of money, how the dollar is managed, whether well
or poorly, affects all Americans. And because the dollar is used
as a global currency reserve, its management affects nearly all
the world.
Boik’s proposal for applying democratic decision making to a
well-designed complementary currency system and innovative
corporate model is therefore an important and useful contribution.
His proposal distributes decision-making power, as well
as responsibility, to all individuals who participate. It strives
to demonstrate a financial system that is not only transparent
and well managed, but managed in such a way as to consciously
celebrate money as the “common good” that it is.
One beauty of this proposal is that the complementary currency
system could strengthen the larger U.S. dollar economy on which
we all depend. As just one example, it provides an investment
system that rewards businesses for respecting basic human, ecological,
and community values. Although such respect is necessary
for social and financial stability, our current investment
system all too often rewards the opposite.
The token currency Boik proposes would be an excellent fit
for the kind of “monetary ecology” I describe in Money and
Sustainability: The Missing Link.2 A monetary ecology can help
us meet the challenges converging upon us in this first half of
the 21st century. Just as a natural forest contains a diversity of
fauna and flora adapted to specific niches and scales, a monetary
ecology contains currencies adapted to different needs, locations,
and scales.
Diversity within an ecosystem makes it more robust, more resilient
to shocks and changes in environmental conditions. Diversity
within monetary systems could do the same. In fact, in
any complex flow network, a minimum of diversity is needed to
make it sustainable over time. The theories and facts of our recurrent
monetary and financial crises compel us to leave behind the
paradigm of an artificially enforced national currency monopoly
and promote instead a diverse monetary ecology. This is not a
threat to national currencies; it is their savior.
I dare to compare parts of this book with Plato’s Republic, updated
for the age of the Internet. It inspires us to use modern
technology as a tool for examining the meaning and value of
justice, as we engage in decision-making tasks and bring a more
sustainable world to life. Its significant achievement already is
the portrayal of a plausible positive breakthrough from the crisis
of hope in which we are now immersed. I am wishing the book
great success, if only for the better world that implementation of
its solutions would create.
I am convinced that the ideas in this book are implementable.
But whether or not these proposals will actually be developed
further and made manifest is an open question. If you, the reader,
get involved, offer support, provide skills, and spread the word,
implementation is all the more likely. It is my belief that once this
project gains traction, it could unleash unprecedented creativity
in multiple communities and domains."
==Creating a locally-driven Principled Society==
John Boik:
"The central strategy examined in this book is to implement new
financial, economic, and governance systems at the local level,
managed through an online software application. The application
would facilitate, for example, business and financial transactions,
and rule-making and other aspects of self-governance.
It would be the world’s first comprehensive Internet project
aimed at a fundamental transformation of society. Think of it
as components of Facebook, Kiva, Quicken, RocketHub, Kick-
Starter, LendingClub, MindTools, Groupon, LinkedIn, and more,
all integrated into a single application developed and managed
by users. Its purpose is to stimulate local economies, demonstrate
direct democracy, and maximize the common good. In
short, it is the maturing of social media into a powerful, usercreated,
agent of change.
The code for this application would be developed by the opensource
community, and as such would be a publicly shared
resource. Programmers, writers, graphic designers, and other
volunteers nationwide and beyond would be invited to partici-
pate in its development. Although the development project itself
would occur nationally, the actual implementations would occur
at the local level. Once the code is available and thoroughly
tested, perhaps via large game simulations, people in each metro
region would be encouraged to form a Principled Society—a special
type of corporation that would demonstrate the new systems
and manage the local software application.
As envisioned, a Principled Society is a membership organization.
Other well-known membership organizations include
AARP, the National Organization for Women, and your local
Chamber of Commerce. Unlike these, however, a Principled Society
is not a nonprofit. Nor is it a profit-maximizing corporation.
It is a socially responsible corporation that is a blend of both.
Like a nonprofit, it seeks to maximize the public good. Like
a for-profit, it does not rely on charity for funding its ongoing
operations and expansion. A Principled Society is managed by
its members through collaborative direct democracy. As such, a
Principled Society is its members. It is an association of people
who choose to cooperate.
Quite likely, only a small percentage of the population in a given
metro area will decide to become members of a Society, but that
is not a problem. In fact, it is an advantage. Demonstrating new
financial, economic, and governance systems would be easier
in a small subset of the population. The target is to achieve
a participation rate of 10 percent. This would be enough to
produce substantial economic impacts and provide a solid test
of the new systems.
While successful demonstration of new systems in a small subset
is not by itself sufficient to transform society as a whole, it is
a crucial and dramatic first step. Thus, this book is concerned
with Phase I—getting Principled Societies up and running. If all
goes well, over time Phase I will naturally turn into Phase II—
wider implementation of the new systems and a more complete
transformation."
==Framework of a Principled Society==
"A Principled Society is envisioned as a local entity, but its core
elements would be designed to overcome several major weaknesses
seen at the national level. In this way, Principled Societies
would be extensible to wider implementation in the future. The
proposed framework consists of three core elements:
1. A new type of local currency system, called a Token
Exchange System. Tokens are an electronic form of currency
that circulates within a Society, in conjunction with
the dollar. They are used by businesses and individuals
to purchase goods and services, as well as fund local
development and community services.
2. A new type of socially responsible corporation, called
a Principled Business. A Principled Business is a cross
between a nonprofit and a for-profit corporation. Like a
nonprofit, it fulfills a social mission. Like a for-profit, it
is self-sustaining and does not rely on donations. Principled
Businesses compete with one another for interestfree
loans offered by a Society. They coexist alongside
standard businesses.
3. A new type of governance system based on collaborative
direct democracy, called a Collaborative Governance
System. Members collaborate in the creative
problem-solving process of developing new rules. In
a Principled Society, members are the legislature. For
efficiency, councils would execute day-to-day operations
and make minor decisions. Major issues would be decided
by the entire membership in a user-friendly, efficient,
online process.
The Internet application that would act as the infrastructure for
a Principled Society is both practical and technologically achievable.
It could be developed as a no-frills initial version perhaps
with three to ten years of effort, given adequate funding and
community interest. Each year thereafter, further enhancements
could follow. From the beginning, the effort will be organic, and
hopefully involve many thousands as momentum grows. Each
interested person can contribute in small or large ways to move
the project forward.
Although this book proposes a blueprint for new financial, economic,
and governance systems, that blueprint is only a rough
draft. Many questions are left unanswered. It is intended as a
basis for further discussion and refinement. The bulk of development
will fall to the wider community. Especially it will fall to
potential users, including interested lay persons, programmers,
and business and community leaders. Academic experts from
fields as diverse as computer science, political science, statistics,
sociology, law, ecology, business, psychology, and linguistics
will be encouraged to play a central role. As the software is
tested and Principled Societies are developed, academics will be
encouraged to play a continuing role."
==Principles==
John Boik, in: [[Creating Sustainable Societies]]:
Principle 1: A Principled Society seeks to increase the shared
wealth of its members, as well as the shared wealth of the greater community.
Principle 2: A Principled Society’s financial and governance
systems are radically transparent.
Principle 3: A Principled Society effectively distributes political
power among all its members.
Principle 4: A Principled Society does not create its
complementary currency through bank debt.
Principle 5: In a Principled Society, interest is not charged on
complementary currency loans, and investment occurs in a profit-neutral fashion.
Principle 6: A Principled Society manages its complementary
currency system so as to attain a democratically determined
wealth distribution target.
==The Token Exchange System==
John Boik:
"the Token Exchange System, the first core
element of the Principled Societies framework. This finance system
has its own currency, called tokens, which circulate within a
metro region. Tokens are used as a complement to the dollar, not
as an alternative. The token system provides a structured means
to stimulate local business investment, fund social services, and
give a community more control over its destiny. The new currency
is, in a real sense, a manifestation of a community’s faith
in itself and its desires for a better world.
...
The Token Exchange System is different from other existing
or historical complementary currency systems. It is electronic
(unlike BerkShares or Ithaca HOURS); it is centrally managed
(unlike bitcoin); it employs demurrage (unlike all of the above);
and it is not based on labor hours (like Time Bank). And unlike
all others, it is fully integrated into the economic and governance
systems of a Society. For example, distribution of wealth,
funding of community nonprofits, promotion of business investment,
and democratic decision making are all integrated into
the currency system itself. As well, it employs a wide spectrum
of motivational factors to achieve cooperation and other types
of pro-social behavior among users. Lastly, it is designed for
scalability; there is no limit to the size of community that a token
system could serve."
==The Principled Business Model==
John Boik:
"The second core element in the Principled Societies framework is
the Principled Businesses model. A Principled Business is a type
of socially responsible entity that members of a Principled Society
create and fund. Not every business that a Society creates or
funds will be a Principled Business; many will be standard corporations,
partnerships, and sole proprietorships. The Principled
Business model is designed to appeal to those entrepreneurs and
groups who might otherwise desire to start a nonprofit, but who
also want to own their business and compete in the marketplace
for self-sustaining revenues. The Principled Business model is a
cross between, and offers the best of, the nonprofit and for-profit
models.
A true partnership exists between members of a Society, who
benefit from the activity of Principled Businesses, and the businesses
themselves, which rely on member support and loyalty.
It is an ongoing interaction that requires communication and
goodwill. The task is to design the model so that expectations
are clear, activities can be verified, goals are shared, penalties are
understood, and healthy relationships are fostered."
...
As with the term “Principled Society”, the term
“Principled Business” is not intended to imply that other forms
of organization are unprincipled. Rather, it refers to a specific
type of business that meets the following criteria:
1. The actions of a Principled Business are consistent with
its social mission.
2. A Principled Business is designed to attain financial and economic sustainability.
3. Investors do not profit from a Principled Business.
4. Revenues are used in accordance with the submitted business plan.
5. The firm adheres to basic environmental stewardship
practices, as demonstrated through certification with an
approved third party.
6. The firm operates in a transparent fashion. Financial
data that 501(c)3 nonprofits and publicly traded corporations
must disclose are made public. In addition,
funding sources and statistics on the distribution of compensation
are revealed. Measurements of externalized
costs and social and environmental impact are disclosed,
where these can be practically and economically obtained.
7. The firm adheres to a conflict-of-interest policy. Board
members having financial or familial conflicts of interest
must recuse themselves from decisions where such a conflict exists.
8. Upon dissolution and after payment of creditors, the
firm must transfer any remaining assets to nonprofit
charities or to Principled Businesses in which no board
member has a conflict of interest. Determinations made
by a bankruptcy court take precedence. Further, Principled
Businesses cannot be sold or given to an entity that
is not a Principled Business.
9. The firm cannot fund other businesses that are not Principled
Businesses. It can wholly purchase other business,
as long as the combined entity continues to act as a Principled
Business."
==The Collaborative Governance System==
John Boik:
"The third and last core element in the Principled Societies framework
is the Collaborative Governance System. Its purpose is
to foster a form of democratic self-governance that involves
all members of a Society in the creative, collaborative problemsolving
process. The proposal is bold. It is among the first to
incorporate online mass collaboration into a self-governance
process.
There are two primary reasons why a Principled Society would
want to engage its full membership in decision making. First, the
strength and vitality of a Society derives from its cohesiveness—
the degree to which members want to be members. A Society
is a corporation that sells a product. That product is a better
community, greater economic security, heightened political empowerment,
and other aspects of increased shared wealth. If
it delivers these, it will achieve a loyal and spirited following.
But it can’t do this if it limits decision-making power to a small
minority.
The second reason to engage the full membership is that every
individual can be a source of creativity and wisdom. A Society
can tap the experience, skills, and ideas of all its members when it
tries to solve a problem. The modern term for this is crowdsolving.
Netflix famously used crowdsolving in 2009 to improve the
algorithm by which it predicts the movies a particular customer
might enjoy. Rather than hire engineers and statisticians, the
company set up a website, posted a huge data set of movie and
subscriber information, and offered $1 million to anyone who
could improve its algorithm by 10 percent. Groups from
around the world entered. For Netflix, the price of the prize was
small compared to the value of the product it received.
Of course, a group of people can also act as a destructive, shortsighted,
and even irrational mob. But that alone is not a valid
reason to limit direct democracy. Political representatives too can
act in these ways. And so can business leaders. Our world would
be a different place if this were not true. The task of a Principled
Society is to create transparent, intelligent, sustainable, stable,
and fair systems for self-governance and economic and financial
activity, and to combine these with healthy cultural norms, an
embrace of science, and an educated membership. Under these
conditions, we can expect humans to be at their best."
=More Information=
* [[Wealthiness]]
* [[Local Currencies]]
[[Category:Books]]
[[Category:Collaborative Economy]]
[[Category:Money]]
[[Category:Economics]]
[[Category:P2P Infrastructure]]
[[Category:Open Company Formats]]

Latest revision as of 09:45, 14 July 2012