Talk:Core Peer-2-Peer Collaboration Principles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Poor Richard (talk | contribs) (PR comments) |
Poor Richard (talk | contribs) (PR) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This is expansive and open-ended (good):"P2P should evolve to meet whatever needs peers have in building a commons or similar works. Perhaps the term or whole concept of P2P will be subsumed by other ideas..." | This is expansive and open-ended (good):"P2P should evolve to meet whatever needs peers have in building a commons or similar works. Perhaps the term or whole concept of P2P will be subsumed by other ideas..." | ||
This | This seems arbitrarily constrained: "...without direct expectation of reciprocity from any particular individual. It is therefore not a hierarchical allocation method, not an exchange based market form, and not a reciprocity based gift economy." | ||
Why rule all those things out of peer collaborations? | |||
--[[User:Poor Richard|Poor Richard]] 19:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:05, 28 June 2012
--Poor Richard 17:54, 28 June 2012 (UTC) This is expansive and open-ended (good):"P2P should evolve to meet whatever needs peers have in building a commons or similar works. Perhaps the term or whole concept of P2P will be subsumed by other ideas..."
This seems arbitrarily constrained: "...without direct expectation of reciprocity from any particular individual. It is therefore not a hierarchical allocation method, not an exchange based market form, and not a reciprocity based gift economy."
Why rule all those things out of peer collaborations? --Poor Richard 19:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)