Talk:Universal Debating Project: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Janos, | |||
Thank you for your response. Yes, this is "..a fascinating proposal." I like your diagram too and ofcourse, the key subjects there can be sub-divided further (eg. Economics...Binary Economics,Behavioural Economics, Environmental Economics,et al). Time allowing I hope to expand the concept of the UDP. | |||
RS. | |||
This is a fascinating proposal. | This is a fascinating proposal. | ||
Ambitious, as you say, but badly needed in view of the enormous amount of information filling cyberspace. | Ambitious, as you say, but badly needed in view of the enormous amount of information filling cyberspace. | ||
Revision as of 12:06, 1 September 2011
Janos,
Thank you for your response. Yes, this is "..a fascinating proposal." I like your diagram too and ofcourse, the key subjects there can be sub-divided further (eg. Economics...Binary Economics,Behavioural Economics, Environmental Economics,et al). Time allowing I hope to expand the concept of the UDP.
RS.
This is a fascinating proposal.
Ambitious, as you say, but badly needed in view of the enormous amount of information filling cyberspace.
Crafting a manageable but sufficient number of categories to contain increasingly specific knowledge items is part of the job.
I have been gestating a twelve division knowledge base with not much success on my own:
--Janosabel 21:54, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
