Small Property Mode of Production: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 34: Line 34:


Scale & Technology: Inherently limits scale. Technology is oriented toward skill enhancement and sustainability rather than labour displacement and mass output.
Scale & Technology: Inherently limits scale. Technology is oriented toward skill enhancement and sustainability rather than labour displacement and mass output.
= More information =
* The theory of peasant economy.  [by] A.V. Chayanov. Edited by Daniel Thorner, Basile Kerblay [and] R.E.F. Smith. American Economic Association translation series, 1966
ToC:
# Chayanov's concept of peasant economy, by D. Thorner.
# A.V. Chayanov: life, career, works, by B. Kerblay.
# On the theory of non-capitalist economic systems, translated by C. Lane.
# Peasant farm organization, translated by R.E.F. Smith.
# Bibliography of A.V. Chayanov (p. 279-296)
[[Category:Agrifood]]


[[Category:P2P_Class_Theory]]
[[Category:P2P_Class_Theory]]
[[Category:P2P_History]]
[[Category:P2P_History]]

Latest revision as of 15:35, 14 December 2025

Description

Via DeepSeek:

"The "Small Property Mode of Production" (SPMP) is not a universally standardized term but is rooted in classic analyses of economic systems. It primarily describes a pre-capitalist or non-capitalist form of production where:

  • Direct producers (artisans, peasants, freeholders) own their means of production (tools, land, workshops).
  • Production is primarily for personal use or direct exchange in local markets, not for generating surplus value for a capitalist class.
  • The scale is small and decentralized, often organized around the household or small workshop.


Its analysis stems from two main theoretical lineages:

  • Classical Political Economy & Marxism Karl Marx (Petty/Mode of Production, "Simple Commodity Production"), Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (Mutualism) Marx analyzed it as a transitional form eroded by capitalism. Proudhon saw decentralized small property as a foundation for a mutualist society.
*Anarchist & Distributist Thought	Mikhail Bakunin, G.K. Chesterton, Hilaire Belloc	Viewed widespread, decentralized property ownership as a bulwark against both state and capitalist concentration of power.

Historical Examples: Medieval guilds, free peasantries, independent artisans, the Jeffersonian ideal of the yeoman farmer.


Characteristics

Defining features:

Property Relations: Ownership is personal and non-alienable. The producer has a direct, often intimate, relationship with their tools and land.

Social Relations: Absence of a permanent wage-labour class. Labour is performed by the owner, family, or through reciprocal/cooperative arrangements (e.g., guilds, commons).

Production Logic: Driven by use-value and livelihood ("production for need") rather than profit-maximization and capital accumulation. Market exchange, when it exists, is for obtaining other use-values.

Scale & Technology: Inherently limits scale. Technology is oriented toward skill enhancement and sustainability rather than labour displacement and mass output.


More information

  • The theory of peasant economy. [by] A.V. Chayanov. Edited by Daniel Thorner, Basile Kerblay [and] R.E.F. Smith. American Economic Association translation series, 1966

ToC:

  1. Chayanov's concept of peasant economy, by D. Thorner.
  2. A.V. Chayanov: life, career, works, by B. Kerblay.
  3. On the theory of non-capitalist economic systems, translated by C. Lane.
  4. Peasant farm organization, translated by R.E.F. Smith.
  5. Bibliography of A.V. Chayanov (p. 279-296)