Regenaissance Protocol: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " =Description= Daniel Mihai: "What if the next currency wasn’t backed by gold, speculation, or energy burn, but by life? Not metaphorically. Not symbolically. But structurally, measurably, and verifiably backed by the regenerative coherence of the systems issuing it. Introducing the Regenaissance Protocol, a dual-consensus mechanism that replaces Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) with Proof-of-Regenerative Capacity (Re) and Proof-of-Realized Regeneratio...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
=Description=
=Description=


Line 16: Line 14:




[[Category:Regenerative Approaches]]
=How To=
 
Daniel Mihai:
 
"Re = “Is the system built to regenerate?”
 
Rx = “Is regeneration actually occurring?”
 
Both scores are assessed using a rigorously defined formula outlined in the Regenerative Ratio Formula Paper, designed to measure structural coherence under entropic pressure. It’s not guesswork. It’s systemic diagnostic math applied to ecological, institutional, and technological networks.
 
You want to mint tokens?
 
* Prove your land, organization, or protocol holds regenerative integrity (Re).
 
* Then, prove that your regenerative architecture actually delivers measurable outcomes, be it restored topsoil, lowered energy throughput, or increased biodiversity (Rx).


[[Category:Crypto Ecology]]
No Re? You’re structurally incoherent. No Rx? You’re full of greenwashed vapor."
 
(https://medium.com/@daniel_mihai/the-regenaissance-protocol-currency-backed-by-regeneration-not-collapse-399271b7739a)


[[Category:Crypto_Ecology]]
[[Category:Regenerative_Approaches]]
[[Category:Ecology]]
[[Category:Ecology]]

Revision as of 05:23, 15 October 2025

Description

Daniel Mihai:

"What if the next currency wasn’t backed by gold, speculation, or energy burn, but by life?

Not metaphorically. Not symbolically. But structurally, measurably, and verifiably backed by the regenerative coherence of the systems issuing it.

Introducing the Regenaissance Protocol, a dual-consensus mechanism that replaces Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) with Proof-of-Regenerative Capacity (Re) and Proof-of-Realized Regeneration (Rx).

We’re not interested in mining tokens through brute force or idle capital. We’re interested in minting vitality. The Regenaissance Protocol doesn’t just reward the possibility of regeneration (Re), it requires evidence that regeneration is actually happening (Rx)."

(https://medium.com/@daniel_mihai/the-regenaissance-protocol-currency-backed-by-regeneration-not-collapse-399271b7739a)


How To

Daniel Mihai:

"Re = “Is the system built to regenerate?”

Rx = “Is regeneration actually occurring?”

Both scores are assessed using a rigorously defined formula outlined in the Regenerative Ratio Formula Paper, designed to measure structural coherence under entropic pressure. It’s not guesswork. It’s systemic diagnostic math applied to ecological, institutional, and technological networks.

You want to mint tokens?

  • Prove your land, organization, or protocol holds regenerative integrity (Re).
  • Then, prove that your regenerative architecture actually delivers measurable outcomes, be it restored topsoil, lowered energy throughput, or increased biodiversity (Rx).

No Re? You’re structurally incoherent. No Rx? You’re full of greenwashed vapor."

(https://medium.com/@daniel_mihai/the-regenaissance-protocol-currency-backed-by-regeneration-not-collapse-399271b7739a)