Virtue Hoarders: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
unknown (talk)
(Created page with " '''* Book: Catherine Liu. Virtue Hoarders: The Case Against the Professional Managerial Class. University of Minnesota Press,''' URL = =Description= Washington Examiner:...")
 
unknown (talk)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''* Book: Catherine Liu. Virtue Hoarders: The Case Against the [[Professional Managerial Class]]. University of Minnesota Press,'''


'''* Book: Catherine Liu. Virtue Hoarders: The Case Against the Professional Managerial Class. University of Minnesota Press,'''
URL = https://www.upress.umn.edu/press/press-clips/washington-examiner-the-dictatorship-of-virtue
 
URL =


=Description=
=Description=
Line 11: Line 10:


(https://www.upress.umn.edu/press/press-clips/washington-examiner-the-dictatorship-of-virtue)
(https://www.upress.umn.edu/press/press-clips/washington-examiner-the-dictatorship-of-virtue)
=Discussion=
Lizzie Warren
"the upper echelons of the PMC inhabit a conflictual class position, which scrambles their thinking. Stocks, tantalizing promotional possibilities, and bonuses and benefits galore—who can blame them for believing their bosses are the good guys? The PMC resists a basic understanding of class conflict in favor of cohering as a social group around cultural and moral issues for simple material reasons.
Upper-PMC workers also need to believe in the “goodness” of their companies and the people who run them to do their jobs successfully. And the bosses are increasingly keen to confirm this belief, ever more interested in projecting to the public they’re on the right side of history. They care about Black Lives, feminism, democracy, mental health, and so on. Where marketing before surreptitiously sold sex appeal, today it peddles moral appeal, and a certain stratum of workers has been primed to accept the marketing as true.
The PMC understands that the world is in dire straits, and that they must commit wholeheartedly to doing something about it. Manic defenses rush in: grand activity triumphantly banishes doubt. An inflated sense of one’s own power masks the overwhelm of external reality. The goal is to stay busy all of the time—and not just busy in the traditional sense of productivity, but busy being a particular kind of human being.
The economy of subjectification demands a continual, largely unconscious curation of a self that is engaged, committed, socially aware, and virtuous—precisely not the kind of person who would kill themselves for a job they hate at a company that is morally bankrupt. Nor the kind of person who would accept an easy, pointless job in exchange for a lot of money. Personal accommodation to corrupt social structures to make ends meet threatens their identity. “It’s just a job” no longer flies as an excuse.
The ethos of Silicon Valley encourages this form of omnipotent denial. Winners abound, and they are clear evidence that you can indeed have it all: the money, the status, and the virtue."
(https://damagemag.com/2022/01/19/inside-the-mind-of-the-professional-managerial-class-part-five-elite-betrayal/)


[[Category:P2P Class Theory]]
[[Category:P2P Class Theory]]
[[Category:Identity Politics]]
[[Category:Identity Politics]]
[[Category:Books]]
[[Category:Books]]

Revision as of 05:54, 16 July 2022

* Book: Catherine Liu. Virtue Hoarders: The Case Against the Professional Managerial Class. University of Minnesota Press,

URL = https://www.upress.umn.edu/press/press-clips/washington-examiner-the-dictatorship-of-virtue

Description

Washington Examiner:

"Catherine Liu’s polemical new book, Virtue Hoarders: The Case Against the Professional Managerial Class, argues that the professional-managerial class-working class alliance was doomed from the start for the simple reason that the two classes’ interests are fundamentally opposed. As Liu states in the first sentence of the book: “For as long as most of us can remember, the professional-managerial class has been fighting a class war, not against capitalists or capitalism, but against the working classes.” Whereas Winant claimed that the declining economic prospects of the highly educated have created the conditions for solidarity with the toiling masses, Liu views this as a mirage. Although the professional-managerial class has been losing ground to the 1% in financial terms, it has also been hoarding another commodity, virtue, and using it to wage all-out war against its social inferiors."

(https://www.upress.umn.edu/press/press-clips/washington-examiner-the-dictatorship-of-virtue)


Discussion

Lizzie Warren

"the upper echelons of the PMC inhabit a conflictual class position, which scrambles their thinking. Stocks, tantalizing promotional possibilities, and bonuses and benefits galore—who can blame them for believing their bosses are the good guys? The PMC resists a basic understanding of class conflict in favor of cohering as a social group around cultural and moral issues for simple material reasons.

Upper-PMC workers also need to believe in the “goodness” of their companies and the people who run them to do their jobs successfully. And the bosses are increasingly keen to confirm this belief, ever more interested in projecting to the public they’re on the right side of history. They care about Black Lives, feminism, democracy, mental health, and so on. Where marketing before surreptitiously sold sex appeal, today it peddles moral appeal, and a certain stratum of workers has been primed to accept the marketing as true.

The PMC understands that the world is in dire straits, and that they must commit wholeheartedly to doing something about it. Manic defenses rush in: grand activity triumphantly banishes doubt. An inflated sense of one’s own power masks the overwhelm of external reality. The goal is to stay busy all of the time—and not just busy in the traditional sense of productivity, but busy being a particular kind of human being. The economy of subjectification demands a continual, largely unconscious curation of a self that is engaged, committed, socially aware, and virtuous—precisely not the kind of person who would kill themselves for a job they hate at a company that is morally bankrupt. Nor the kind of person who would accept an easy, pointless job in exchange for a lot of money. Personal accommodation to corrupt social structures to make ends meet threatens their identity. “It’s just a job” no longer flies as an excuse.

The ethos of Silicon Valley encourages this form of omnipotent denial. Winners abound, and they are clear evidence that you can indeed have it all: the money, the status, and the virtue."

(https://damagemag.com/2022/01/19/inside-the-mind-of-the-professional-managerial-class-part-five-elite-betrayal/)