Meta-Industrial Class: Difference between revisions
m (moved Meta-industrial Class to Meta-Industrial Class: caps) |
unknown (talk) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''= "bringing the invisible work of reproduction, ... meta-industrial labour, at the center of a Synergistic politics. This labour is characterised by the direct mediation of human and natural cycles whereas productivist labour, is linear and pursues a single goal regardless of consequence".''' [https://thecommoner.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/issue-09-spring-summer-2004-introduction.pdf] | |||
=Description= | =Description= | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
complexity’). The term ‘meta-industrial’ thus has both positive (immanent) and normative | complexity’). The term ‘meta-industrial’ thus has both positive (immanent) and normative | ||
(transcendent) senses." | (transcendent) senses." | ||
(http://arielsalleh.info/theory/eco-socialism/d-and-n/d-and-n-article.pdf) | (http://arielsalleh.info/theory/eco-socialism/d-and-n/d-and-n-article.pdf) | ||
| Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
[[Category:Politics]] | [[Category:Politics]] | ||
[[Category:P2P Class Theory]] | |||
[[Category:Politics]] | |||
[[Category:P2P Class Theory]] | [[Category:P2P Class Theory]] | ||
[[Category:Labor]] | |||
Latest revision as of 05:31, 5 May 2022
= "bringing the invisible work of reproduction, ... meta-industrial labour, at the center of a Synergistic politics. This labour is characterised by the direct mediation of human and natural cycles whereas productivist labour, is linear and pursues a single goal regardless of consequence". [1]
Description
Ariel Salleh:
"In Ecofeminism as Politics (1997) I introduce the term ‘meta-industrial’ to designate a hitherto unrecognised class whose labours and value orientation in relation to ‘nature’ leave them at the margins the tele–pharmo–nuclear complex. Strictly speaking, meta-industrial groupings such as women domestic workers, subsistence farmers, and indigenous peoples, are both inside and outside of the dominant hegemony. They are inside in as much as they are essential ‘resources’ but as political ‘subjects’ they are largely outside. At an existential level, this structural contradiction is a source of insight and political motivation (viz. my chapter 11—‘agents of complexity’). The term ‘meta-industrial’ thus has both positive (immanent) and normative (transcendent) senses."
(http://arielsalleh.info/theory/eco-socialism/d-and-n/d-and-n-article.pdf)