Talk:Free Culture Timeline: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
= Links from original =
Was it a conscious choice not to include the links to the primary sources? If not, and you'd like to have them in the page, I'll add it to my ToDo list. --[[User:Strypey|Strypey]] ([[User talk:Strypey|talk]]) 13:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Was it a conscious choice not to include the links to the primary sources? If not, and you'd like to have them in the page, I'll add it to my ToDo list. --[[User:Strypey|Strypey]] ([[User talk:Strypey|talk]]) 13:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


Line 15: Line 17:


--[[User:Mbauwens|MIchel Bauwens]] ([[User talk:Mbauwens|talk]]) 09:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
--[[User:Mbauwens|MIchel Bauwens]] ([[User talk:Mbauwens|talk]]) 09:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
= Changing section structure =
: Does anyone mind if I change the heading structure to divide the sections by decade instead of year (eg 1970s, instead of 1971, 1972 etc)? At present, the contents box is *very* long, and there are a lot of headings, each with very few items under them. --[[User:Strypey|Strypey]] ([[User talk:Strypey|talk]]) 15:33, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:33, 15 January 2019

Links from original

Was it a conscious choice not to include the links to the primary sources? If not, and you'd like to have them in the page, I'll add it to my ToDo list. --Strypey (talk) 13:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

that was probably just an issue of lack of time!! so if possible, yes, it would be great. Thanks so much for all your contributions!!

--MIchel Bauwens (talk) 09:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

De nada :) I intend to tidy up the 'porting' of a number of pages from the Disintermedia wiki, and 'retire' the original versions, pointing readers and contributors to the P2PF wiki versions. This will involve ensuring that all information, including links, has been successfully ported to the new page. --Strypey (talk) 05:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)


thanks for much for the trust in our work and our platform, and for your own original work in compiling all these resources for your own communities, cybrarians of the world, unite <g> !!

--MIchel Bauwens (talk) 09:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Changing section structure

Does anyone mind if I change the heading structure to divide the sections by decade instead of year (eg 1970s, instead of 1971, 1972 etc)? At present, the contents box is *very* long, and there are a lot of headings, each with very few items under them. --Strypey (talk) 15:33, 15 January 2019 (UTC)