Top Ten P2P Trends of 2016: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
==P2P Value report | ==P2P Value report== | ||
https://p2pvalue.eu/762-2/ .. full report at https://www.academia.edu/29210209/Commons_Based_Peer_Production_in_the_Information_Economy | https://p2pvalue.eu/762-2/ .. full report at https://www.academia.edu/29210209/Commons_Based_Peer_Production_in_the_Information_Economy | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
3. Reputation capital is a fictitious commodity that has an effective capacity to drive and allocate resources to these common projects. | 3. Reputation capital is a fictitious commodity that has an effective capacity to drive and allocate resources to these common projects. | ||
This document is therefore a must-read for the P2P and Commons community. | This document is therefore a must-read for the P2P and Commons community. | ||
==P2P Foundation research comes of age== | ==P2P Foundation research comes of age== | ||
Revision as of 17:08, 2 January 2017
very early draft for publication in december 2016
Civic and Commons Renaissance in western european cities
oikos report findings /
iaone report
jose ramos book
The emergence of Super-Competent Democracies
Municipal Coalitions
see Category:Urbanism for a slate of books
Naples and other rebel cities, see: City-Based Departments of the Commons
Municipal coalitions Bcomu, ahora madrid
jose ramos book , iaone report
Platform Cooperativism comes of age
Politisation of the Commons
European Commons Assembly
P2P Value report
https://p2pvalue.eu/762-2/ .. full report at https://www.academia.edu/29210209/Commons_Based_Peer_Production_in_the_Information_Economy
Intro by Michel Bauwens: P2P Value is a landmark study because it is the first long (3-year) scientific study of 300+ peer production communities, and it largely confirms the ten years of empirical observations that form the basis of P2P Theory and the documentation in the P2P Foundation Wiki. Our team was also one of the 8 partners in the consortium. Here are some interesting findings, which I would like to highlight: 1. These communities are also ‘imaginary communities’ with specific values, i..e. they want to make the world a better place, i.e. they are ethical communities not just profit-maximising entities, and their identification is in global networks, not just the locales they are embedded in. This is historically important since it echoes the birth of nation-states as imaginary communities (see Benedict Anderson’s landmark book on this topic) 2. A majority of 78% of these communities are practicing, preparing and/or looking into open value or contributory accounting systems; again, this is significant since changes in accounting practices and philosophies have accompanied the great value regime transitions in the past 3. Reputation capital is a fictitious commodity that has an effective capacity to drive and allocate resources to these common projects. This document is therefore a must-read for the P2P and Commons community.
P2P Foundation research comes of age
havens center and boll report