User talk:Mbauwens: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Question)
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


A+ Brice
A+ Brice
REPLY TO BRICE:
Brice, I'm not sure why you mean by old P2P Encyclopedia???




----
----
Michel, not sure why you deleted my content at [[Help:Contents]].  What I am trying to tell a fellow traveler to this wiki, is that they need not worry about duplicating work, that will be sorted out, please get to work and add content!  As it stands, I feel someone might not want to traverse through here and figure out what has been done before they do anything. I think they would just leave, more than likely. Best, [[MarkDilley]]
Michel, not sure why you deleted my content at [[Help:Contents]].  What I am trying to tell a fellow traveler to this wiki, is that they need not worry about duplicating work, that will be sorted out, please get to work and add content!  As it stands, I feel someone might not want to traverse through here and figure out what has been done before they do anything. I think they would just leave, more than likely. Best, [[MarkDilley]]
REPLY TO MARK:
Mark, I only deleted one allpages alternative that lead to nowhere, I thought it was a mistake? One alternative gives a list, the other just an empty page.

Revision as of 02:29, 3 July 2006

Michel your old P2P Encyclopedia is still here :

P2P Encyclopedia

You can delete if you don't need it anymore.

A+ Brice


REPLY TO BRICE:

Brice, I'm not sure why you mean by old P2P Encyclopedia???



Michel, not sure why you deleted my content at Help:Contents. What I am trying to tell a fellow traveler to this wiki, is that they need not worry about duplicating work, that will be sorted out, please get to work and add content! As it stands, I feel someone might not want to traverse through here and figure out what has been done before they do anything. I think they would just leave, more than likely. Best, MarkDilley


REPLY TO MARK:

Mark, I only deleted one allpages alternative that lead to nowhere, I thought it was a mistake? One alternative gives a list, the other just an empty page.