Talk:P2P Companion Concepts: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Created page with 'Wow, this page is really growing. I am beginning to feel the need for caution and order. I am wondering how we might use integral theory to see our way through this to a collec...')
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Alex,
I propose 2 steps:
1) once I finished the a to z selection, we have some voting mechanisms to filter out key concepts, let's say max 50 ...
2) we then organize them in your proposed AQAL structure, IF I/we can find help for such visiualization ...
--[[User:Mbauwens|Mbauwens]] 05:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
**
Wow, this page is really growing.  I am beginning to feel the need for caution and order.  I am wondering how we might use integral theory to see our way through this to a collection or collection of concepts that is approachable, and allows us to edit with a methodology.   
Wow, this page is really growing.  I am beginning to feel the need for caution and order.  I am wondering how we might use integral theory to see our way through this to a collection or collection of concepts that is approachable, and allows us to edit with a methodology.   



Revision as of 05:59, 23 June 2010

Alex,

I propose 2 steps:

1) once I finished the a to z selection, we have some voting mechanisms to filter out key concepts, let's say max 50 ...

2) we then organize them in your proposed AQAL structure, IF I/we can find help for such visiualization ...

--Mbauwens 05:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Wow, this page is really growing. I am beginning to feel the need for caution and order. I am wondering how we might use integral theory to see our way through this to a collection or collection of concepts that is approachable, and allows us to edit with a methodology.

This image that Michel made long ago uses some integral theory for grouping. http://p2pfoundation.net/images/P2PBusinessVisualization1.jpg

Integral theory was also used in his seminal book on P2P http://integralvisioning.org/article.php?story=p2ptheory1

An intro to integral theory can be found here. http://integrallife.com/learn/overview/essential-introduction-integral-approach

I find it to be the biggest map out there, but perhaps you have another in mind.

An easy was to say it is:

  1. Mind, Life, Matter
  2. I, We, It/Its
  3. The True, the Good, the Beautiful

So the organization starts to look like:

  1. Concepts on personal reality (Mind, I, True)
  2. How we are together (Life, We, Good)
  3. The way of Things (Matter, It/Its, The Beautiful)

Integral theory also has levels. One of the tricks of this is "Aperspectivism," a sort of requirement to view each concept from every level. --Alex Rollin 09:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)