/index.php: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== Les Assemblées des Communs == Les assemblées sont constituées à l’échelle locale des « porteurs de communs » que sont par exemple les tiers-lieux, les jardins par...")
 
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Les Assemblées des Communs ==
== Notes by Paul B. Hartzog ==
Les assemblées sont constituées à l’échelle locale des « porteurs de communs »  que sont par exemple les tiers-lieux, les jardins partagés, les projets  d’habitat coopératif, une foncière comme « Terre de Liens », des  monnaie complémentaire, les producteurs et diffuseurs d’œuvres du  domaine public, les développeurs de logiciels libres, une épicerie  coopérative, un fournisseur d’accès à Internet associatif et citoyen,  une régie de quartier, une conciergerie solidaire, un dispensaire  social, une université populaire…


=== Elles se donnent comme objectif : ===
Michel Bauwens, notes
* De répertorier et diffuser les actions liées aux communs, d'aider à mettre en lien les communs. Par exemple, une Assemblée des Communs autour de l'alimentation tâcherait d'aider les épiceries participatives à documenter leur modèle, à gérer sous forme de commun leur références producteurs, à acheter groupé, à partager une communauté de contributeurs, à partager un système d'étiquetage, à gérer en commun leur stockage, à imaginer un système de livraison commun, à développer une plateforme d'achat en ligne commune etc...
 
* De gérer la relation aux collectivités et institutions pour définir au cas par cas le cadre de ses actions et des actions de la collectivité (sur la réappropriation de l'espace public par exemple). L'enjeu étant de faire respecter le pacte démocratique. Par exemple, l'assemblée des communs autour de l'alimentation aurait à faire en sorte que la région soutienne ce que les communautés citoyennes développent déjà plutôt qu'une Région redéveloppe un outil propriétaire et fermé de référencement de producteurs (déjà vu des dizaines de fois). L'Assemblée peut-être susceptible de proposer aux pouvoirs publics d’assumer la gestion citoyenne et responsable de certains communs (espaces publics, agriculture dans la ville, tiers-lieux publics, salles associatives, boites à livres et give box…) et des services publics associés.
20 minutes vision, 20 minutes practical
* De coordonner et populariser l’accès, la défense contre les enclosures et le développement des communs sur leur territoire, en élaborant puis en faisant vivre démocratiquement une charte sociale des communs…
 
* De donner des avis sur les communs qu'elle protège et de tracer les choix des élus politiques qui ont signé le pacte démocratique.
young radical Michel, history
* D'animer le débat sur les questions des communs, d'organiser des événements et rencontres sur le sujet qui la concerne.
then into business
* De faire le lien avec la Chambre des Communs qui organise les activités économiques autour des communs. Cette chambre permet d'établir une relation coopérative gagnant – gagnant. Pour cela, elle demande aux acteurs économiques de participer à la rémunération des communs en contrepartie de l'utilisation des ressources et savoirs partagés issus des communs
"this can't be the way"
studied Transformation
 
Michel's Narrative = Fiske + Karatini
 
Fiske overview
combinations of relations throughout history
bushmen meat example = hartzog's pie example
= communal shareholding
some new commons are no longer limited in time and space
 
sedentary lifestyle, tribal, leads to gift economy
= equality matching
rules to prevent concentrations of power, potlatch
 
social stress, conquest, leads to class society
Empire, Incas, join us
 
no society except ours has put the market "on top"
middle ages, city would buy grain and set price
or third party would set the price in a transaction
 
Free cities only in Europe.  "margins of Empire"
the rest of the world was Empires.
Merchants gained power slowly and emerged as a new power.
 
Capitalists won because they existed at the right time during collapse.
 
Modern society has access to new techniques that work better than older forms.
Zog agrees.
wikipedia, contributing to a shared resource
 
IBM adopts Linux to save 90% on their internal infrastructure
have to play along with the Linux community
 
"Commoner" is a person who is pooling / sharing something.
 
Feudal.  Farmers expelled.  Sell their labor in cities.  Became workers.
Unions, etc.
 
= Now.  Workers expelled from the system more and more.
They need to find a transformative solution.
 
Find ways to make dominant institutions (state / market) "work for us"
Extractive models no longer work.
 
There is always an economy around the commons.
Create Open Commons.
Mondragon example.  They hire Polish workers at minimum wage. (bad).
 
Old coops = extractive but together, capitalist mindset
instead lets create entities that create commons.
 
cooperative work shared can be extracted
need Reciprocity Based License to protect the commons
ex. Creative Commons
 
"we need to co-opt them"
 
doubts you can do this in one county.
need trans national cooperation
 
The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson
 
examples from around the globe of commons-building
trans-national civic organizations, and commons networks
 
 
== Notes by John ==
 
TBD
 
[[Category:Research]]
== Notes by Paul B. Hartzog ==
 
Michel Bauwens, notes
 
20 minutes vision, 20 minutes practical
 
young radical Michel, history
then into business
"this can't be the way"
studied Transformation
 
Michel's Narrative = Fiske + Karatini
 
Fiske overview
combinations of relations throughout history
bushmen meat example = hartzog's pie example
= communal shareholding
some new commons are no longer limited in time and space
 
sedentary lifestyle, tribal, leads to gift economy
= equality matching
rules to prevent concentrations of power, potlatch
 
social stress, conquest, leads to class society
Empire, Incas, join us
 
no society except ours has put the market "on top"
middle ages, city would buy grain and set price
or third party would set the price in a transaction
 
Free cities only in Europe.  "margins of Empire"
the rest of the world was Empires.
Merchants gained power slowly and emerged as a new power.
 
Capitalists won because they existed at the right time during collapse.
 
Modern society has access to new techniques that work better than older forms.
Zog agrees.
wikipedia, contributing to a shared resource
 
IBM adopts Linux to save 90% on their internal infrastructure
have to play along with the Linux community
 
"Commoner" is a person who is pooling / sharing something.
 
Feudal. Farmers expelled.  Sell their labor in cities.  Became workers.
Unions, etc.
 
= Now.  Workers expelled from the system more and more.
They need to find a transformative solution.
 
Find ways to make dominant institutions (state / market) "work for us"
Extractive models no longer work.
 
There is always an economy around the commons.
Create Open Commons.
Mondragon example.  They hire Polish workers at minimum wage. (bad).
 
Old coops = extractive but together, capitalist mindset
instead lets create entities that create commons.
 
cooperative work shared can be extracted
need Reciprocity Based License to protect the commons
ex. Creative Commons
 
"we need to co-opt them"
 
doubts you can do this in one county.
need trans national cooperation
 
The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson
 
examples from around the globe of commons-building
trans-national civic organizations, and commons networks
 
 
== Notes by John ==
 
TBD
 
[[Category:Research]]

Latest revision as of 18:06, 12 June 2016

Notes by Paul B. Hartzog

Michel Bauwens, notes

20 minutes vision, 20 minutes practical

young radical Michel, history then into business "this can't be the way" studied Transformation

Michel's Narrative = Fiske + Karatini

Fiske overview combinations of relations throughout history bushmen meat example = hartzog's pie example = communal shareholding some new commons are no longer limited in time and space

sedentary lifestyle, tribal, leads to gift economy = equality matching rules to prevent concentrations of power, potlatch

social stress, conquest, leads to class society Empire, Incas, join us

no society except ours has put the market "on top" middle ages, city would buy grain and set price or third party would set the price in a transaction

Free cities only in Europe. "margins of Empire" the rest of the world was Empires. Merchants gained power slowly and emerged as a new power.

Capitalists won because they existed at the right time during collapse.

Modern society has access to new techniques that work better than older forms. Zog agrees. wikipedia, contributing to a shared resource

IBM adopts Linux to save 90% on their internal infrastructure have to play along with the Linux community

"Commoner" is a person who is pooling / sharing something.

Feudal. Farmers expelled. Sell their labor in cities. Became workers. Unions, etc.

= Now. Workers expelled from the system more and more. They need to find a transformative solution.

Find ways to make dominant institutions (state / market) "work for us" Extractive models no longer work.

There is always an economy around the commons. Create Open Commons. Mondragon example. They hire Polish workers at minimum wage. (bad).

Old coops = extractive but together, capitalist mindset instead lets create entities that create commons.

cooperative work shared can be extracted need Reciprocity Based License to protect the commons ex. Creative Commons

"we need to co-opt them"

doubts you can do this in one county. need trans national cooperation

The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson

examples from around the globe of commons-building trans-national civic organizations, and commons networks


Notes by John

TBD

Notes by Paul B. Hartzog

Michel Bauwens, notes

20 minutes vision, 20 minutes practical

young radical Michel, history then into business "this can't be the way" studied Transformation

Michel's Narrative = Fiske + Karatini

Fiske overview combinations of relations throughout history bushmen meat example = hartzog's pie example = communal shareholding some new commons are no longer limited in time and space

sedentary lifestyle, tribal, leads to gift economy = equality matching rules to prevent concentrations of power, potlatch

social stress, conquest, leads to class society Empire, Incas, join us

no society except ours has put the market "on top" middle ages, city would buy grain and set price or third party would set the price in a transaction

Free cities only in Europe. "margins of Empire" the rest of the world was Empires. Merchants gained power slowly and emerged as a new power.

Capitalists won because they existed at the right time during collapse.

Modern society has access to new techniques that work better than older forms. Zog agrees. wikipedia, contributing to a shared resource

IBM adopts Linux to save 90% on their internal infrastructure have to play along with the Linux community

"Commoner" is a person who is pooling / sharing something.

Feudal. Farmers expelled. Sell their labor in cities. Became workers. Unions, etc.

= Now. Workers expelled from the system more and more. They need to find a transformative solution.

Find ways to make dominant institutions (state / market) "work for us" Extractive models no longer work.

There is always an economy around the commons. Create Open Commons. Mondragon example. They hire Polish workers at minimum wage. (bad).

Old coops = extractive but together, capitalist mindset instead lets create entities that create commons.

cooperative work shared can be extracted need Reciprocity Based License to protect the commons ex. Creative Commons

"we need to co-opt them"

doubts you can do this in one county. need trans national cooperation

The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson

examples from around the globe of commons-building trans-national civic organizations, and commons networks


Notes by John

TBD

Retrieved from "https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/index.php?title=/index.php&oldid=99922"