Talk:On The Commons: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with ' isn't organizations redundant with movements, or does it have a special purpose? for example, we could reserve organizations for our sister org's only ? --~~~~') |
GoodRollin (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
isn't organizations redundant with movements, | isn't organizations redundant with movements, | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
--[[User:Mbauwens|Mbauwens]] 02:11, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Mbauwens|Mbauwens]] 02:11, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
I agree with you. I didn't tag it, and I'm looking for a solution to how to group all of the project things together without needing to know their corporate form or statutory policy. new category is somewhat useful [[:Category:P2P Foundation Network]]. Certainly ambiguous enough. Now for a bigger one that unites all these forms as subcategories. I have always chosen 'entity' but its too ambiguous for most, so i wil refrain from that here. --[[User:GoodRollin|Alex Rollin]] 09:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:36, 3 June 2010
isn't organizations redundant with movements,
or does it have a special purpose? for example, we could reserve organizations for our sister org's only ?
--Mbauwens 02:11, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
I agree with you. I didn't tag it, and I'm looking for a solution to how to group all of the project things together without needing to know their corporate form or statutory policy. new category is somewhat useful Category:P2P Foundation Network. Certainly ambiguous enough. Now for a bigger one that unites all these forms as subcategories. I have always chosen 'entity' but its too ambiguous for most, so i wil refrain from that here. --Alex Rollin 09:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)