Latest revision as of 09:43, 1 February 2017

Let's try a reference. ^[1]

What happens with nested definition lists?

1. The first dt

1.1 The first dd

1.2 including a 2nd level term?

1.2.1 and a 2nd level dd?

1.2.2 1and even a 3rd?: 1.2.2.1 what, 3?

could maybe use these for roll-your-own contents

Here is the interesting reason why double "==" works better.

This is a single = heading

and this is the following text

Another single = heading

and this is the following text

Here is a double == heading

and the text following it

Notice the spacing before the headings!

The double == heading leaves space before it, as expected for a sub-heading

The single = heading is larger, but leaves no space, so to get it looking OK, you have to add an extra space line in the text. As here:

Sandbox

This is a sandbox. I am writing to it.

dtzortzis42

Sandbox2

This is another sandbox

Sandbox3

And another... this is a test by Stacco Troncoso

Sensorica post test

At the third iteration, the service beneficiary gets a fast paced innovation at a quarter of the normal cost. Even more interestingly, the cost cuts aren’t transferred to those who provide the service. They are actual cost savings that result from a heavy use and rapid remix of open source, from the mutualization of resources within the network, from the collaborative nature of activities, from the elimination of bureaucracy, and other inefficiencies that come from lack of motivation. On the contrary, everyone is paid with the same measure, according to the Canadian labor market, no matter where the contributor lives. More precisely, within SENSORICA those who live in Pakistan aren’t paid less. And if that wasn't enough, on top of providing rapid innovation at a fraction of the cost to classical institutions, so that they can maintain jobs, at the same time sensoricans increase the value of the global commons, because everything they do is open source. All the data about the economic activity within SENSORICA is open to the public, we can’t make this up!

This mutually beneficial economic relationship between classical institutions and SENSORICA, as an open innovation and peer production network, can be seen as a bridge between the classical capitalist economy and the p2p economy, as a channel for transfer of resources from the old economy to the new.

The Barda case

The Barda periscope project was the first implementation of a new open project development methodology designed by Fernando, Tiberius and Lynn, in the context of a service provided to a client. This methodology was formalized in SENSORICA’s network resource planning (NRP) software through a concept named Workflow recipes, which are time-dependent and deliverables-dependent bundles of Processes associated with a Project (a context of work). This methodology consists of the following steps: Project initiation, Design considerations, Design, Prototyping, and Product. All the contributions to the Project were logged within this structure.

More information

↑ this is the reference

[1] this is the reference

[1]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Participatory Astronomy
-John Heron
+Let's try a reference. <ref>this is the reference</ref>
-I have for many years sought to live awarely and intentionally within the solar system and its galactic setting, opening myself somatically, aesthetically, intuitively and spiritually to its multidimensional entities and changing patterns. I have called this practice participatory astronomy simply to differentiate it from astrology. At my Centre in Tuscany I had in the grounds several planetary sites for this practice. And when running workshops or launching inquiries I simply have a chart of the current dispositions of the solar system and invite people to be aware of it as a pattern of significant entities, without providing any interpretation.
+What happens with nested definition lists?
+; 1. The first dt
+: 1.1 The first dd
+:; 1.2 including a 2nd level term?
+:: 1.2.1 and a 2nd level dd?
+::; 1.2.2 1and even a 3rd?
+::: 1.2.2.1 what, 3?
+:: could maybe use these for roll-your-own contents
-At this time of year at the summer solstice here in the southern hemisphere, I find the relationship between myself, the earth, the sun and the galactic centre empowering. I think this empowerment is to do with my creative participatory enaction. I believe that I (and any human being) can choose an idiosyncratic mutual engagement between self and earth and a unique pattern of  two or more local heavenly bodies (including deep space entities), and find in that engagement a distinctive qualitative transformation of being. It is an existential mutual dialogue of co-creative participative resonance. For me the significance of celestial bodies and their patterning includes some rough appreciation of the relative distances of the bodies concerned from the earth, and some appreciation of their relative size, motion, moons and other physical attributes, so I need some modicum of astronomical knowledge. I find that for this practice of participatory astronomy to work I need to be mentally free of  traditional notions of aspects and planetary attributes, bracketing them off without either accepting them or rejecting them. I let the presence – both physical and subtle - of each celestial entity, the astronomical pattern and  planetary data, co-create their significance with me. Instead of applying ancient rules, I discover liberation in active imagination engaging with the living chorus of entities in space.  The practice also requires good astronomical (not astrological) software, which provides a window in microcosmic space to prepare my mind for co-creative engagement with bodies, patterns, powers and presences in macrocosmic space. For some years I used RedShift on a PC. Currently I am using Voyager 4 for the Mac and find it better in its presentation of data.
+Here is the interesting reason why double "==" works better.
+=This is a single = heading=
+and this is the following text
+=Another single = heading=
+and this is the following text
+==Here is a double == heading==
+and the text following it
-Psychocosmic co-creativity
+Notice the spacing '''before''' the headings!
-As I see it, the only relevance, within the ancient rules of astrology, of working out correlations between planetary aspects and historical events in the past, is the pragmatic implication of this practice for the present and the future. And the implication of traditional astrology for the future is clear: we sit around and wait for the rule-bound alignments (personal transits or world transits) to occur and for our psyches to be in synchrony with them, and then we can start co-creatively to engage with the predefined archetypal dynamics associated with the alignments. Our cosmic co-creativity is bound by ephemeris watching on the one hand and textbooks on archetypal astrological interpretation on the other. I find this - both experientially and theoretically - a limiting and constrained account of co-creative participatory engagement with our cosmos. By  contrast with this, I believe such co-creativity to be capable, in awakened and potentized humans, of a rich, dynamic, diversity of idiosyncratic empowering enactments in which the unique nature of a human being finds its synchronous correlate in a unique macrocosmic pattern, which is not rule-bound,  but liberated by unpredictable personal engagement with awe and beauty and cosmic drama. Another way of putting this is that there are many new psychocosmic transfigurations awaiting to be enacted. And they are first sensed by spirit immanent in the body, by an empowering bio-spiritual dance of the somatic being  in co-creative resonance with a unique cosmic configuration of self, earth and solar system entities and deep space entities beyond.
+The double == heading leaves space before it, as expected for a sub-heading
-This psychocosmic co-creativity is one way of engaging, through their physical manifestations, with powers and presences that have their primary home in the subtle universe. But it is not the only way or even the main way, just one way. It is also possible, I believe, to engage with powers and presences directly in their primary home. By powers I mean archetypal formative principles of creation; and by presences I mean elevated sublime superpersons who refract and mediate powers.
+The single = heading is larger, but leaves no space, so to get it looking OK, you have to add an extra space line in the text.
+As here:
+= Sandbox =
+This is a sandbox. I am writing to it.
+[[dtzortzis42]]
+=Sandbox2=
+This is another sandbox
+=Sandbox3=
+And another... this is a test by [[Stacco Troncoso]]
+==Sensorica post test ==
+At the third iteration, the service beneficiary gets a fast paced innovation at a quarter of the normal cost. Even more interestingly, the cost cuts aren’t transferred to those who provide the service. They are actual cost savings that result from a heavy use and rapid remix of open source, from the mutualization of resources within the network, from the collaborative nature of activities, from the elimination of bureaucracy, and other inefficiencies that come from lack of motivation. On the contrary, everyone is paid with the same measure, according to the Canadian labor market, no matter where the contributor lives. More precisely, within SENSORICA those who live in Pakistan aren’t paid less. And if that wasn't enough, on top of providing rapid innovation at a fraction of the cost to classical institutions, so that they can maintain jobs, at the same time sensoricans increase the value of the global commons, because everything they do is open source. All the data about the economic activity within SENSORICA is open to the public, we can’t make this up!
+This mutually beneficial economic relationship between classical institutions and SENSORICA, as an open innovation and peer production network, can be seen as a bridge between the classical capitalist economy and the p2p economy, as a channel for transfer of resources from the old economy to the new.
+===The Barda case===
+The Barda periscope project was the first implementation of a new open project development methodology designed by Fernando, Tiberius and Lynn, in the context of a service provided to a client. This methodology was formalized in SENSORICA’s network resource planning (NRP) software through a concept named Workflow recipes, which are time-dependent and deliverables-dependent bundles of Processes associated with a Project (a context of work). This methodology consists of the following steps: Project initiation, Design considerations, Design, Prototyping, and Product. All the contributions to the Project were logged within this structure.
+==More information==
+<references/>

Sandbox: Difference between revisions