Talk:Improvised Voice Instrumental Music: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Robert Searle. | Robert Searle. | ||
Response from Michel: | |||
The issue is just that this is a [[Contextopedia]], not a general resource, so there has to be an angle related to our work. I don't want to be to 'religious' about this, so unless there are major complaints, it's fine for me to keep it here. | |||
--[[User:Mbauwens|Mbauwens]] 03:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:48, 2 December 2010
hi guys, I see some going ons around this page ... do I understand that Franz doubts its relevance in a p2p context? If so, perhaps robert can just add a phrase making the connection clear, so it fits in our 'contextopedia',
--Mbauwens 11:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
I do not see why there has to be unnecessary fuss about this page on P2P. It deals with a very interesting, but controversial musical subject. Moreover, in keeping with P2P "guidelines" it deals with largely original/creative thinking about the need for an improvised version of Voice Instrumental Music. The scope of all this is infact vast....The human voice in itself is a remarkable instrument when used in clever ways........
Robert Searle.
Response from Michel:
The issue is just that this is a Contextopedia, not a general resource, so there has to be an angle related to our work. I don't want to be to 'religious' about this, so unless there are major complaints, it's fine for me to keep it here. --Mbauwens 03:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC)