Vietnam's Policy on AI Sovereignty: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " Nathan Gardels: Vietnam is claiming 'AI Sovereignty': "Who gets to define the terms of intelligence itself? The stakes are stack-level choices — black-box dependence or modular improvisation; opacity or legibility; someone else’s roadmap or a sovereign design of your own … The decision is the difference between consuming intelligence as a service and composing it as an act of sovereignty. One rents a mind, the other trains its own in the wild. “This is, in...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 12:14, 1 October 2025
Nathan Gardels:
Vietnam is claiming 'AI Sovereignty':
"Who gets to define the terms of intelligence itself?
The stakes are stack-level choices — black-box dependence or modular improvisation; opacity or legibility; someone else’s roadmap or a sovereign design of your own … The decision is the difference between consuming intelligence as a service and composing it as an act of sovereignty. One rents a mind, the other trains its own in the wild.
“This is, in essence, a claim to AI sovereignty — the ability to build and govern infrastructures on Vietnam’s own terms while still enabling cross-border flows of data, talent and computation. AI sovereignty here does not mean isolation, but authorship — deciding which data, models and rules shape, and will shape, how machine intelligence is built and deployed."