Golem Network: Difference between revisions
(Created page with " '''= "an open-source and decentralized platform where everyone can use and share each other's computing power without relying on centralized entities like cloud computing corporations".''' URL = https://www.golem.network/ =More information= * Nunet Category:P2P Infrastructure ") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''= "an open-source and decentralized platform where everyone can use and share each other's computing power without relying on centralized entities like cloud computing corporations".''' | '''= "an open-source and decentralized platform where everyone can use and share each other's computing power without relying on centralized entities like cloud computing corporations".''' | ||
URL = https://www.golem.network/ | URL = https://www.golem.network/ | ||
=Characteristics= | |||
Via ChatGPT: | |||
Here’s a detailed comparison of Golem Network and NuNet, highlighting their different visions, architectures, and operational models: | |||
==1. Core Concept & Vision== | |||
Golem Network | |||
Positions itself as a decentralized supercomputer running on Ethereum, aimed primarily at batch tasks like rendering, data crunching, and simulations | |||
Focus: letting providers rent out compute power, requesters submit jobs through smart contracts, and using validators to ensure trust and security | |||
medium.com | |||
NuNet | |||
Seeks to enable a compute-sharing marketplace that taps into idle CPU, GPU, IoT, and mobile resources globally—explicitly targeting AI, IoT, and edge computing use cases . | |||
Envisions a “zero-waste paradigm” where unused compute cycles are harnessed for global benefit, with decentralized, governance-driven orchestration | |||
==2. Architecture & Workflow Coordination== | |||
Golem Network | |||
Uses a match-and-split model: jobs are divided into subtasks, matched to providers, executed, and recombined—all orchestrated via smart contracts and off-chain coordination (e.g., Yagna) | |||
Relatively simpler, modular architecture designed for batch processing, with gradual decentralization of prior centralized control nodes . | |||
NuNet | |||
Offers a rich, self-organizing control plane, where on-chain and off-chain layers co-exist. | |||
Device Management Service (DMS) handles onboarding, identity, resource allocation, and decentralized orchestration across devices, similar to Kubernetes but fully decentralized | |||
Incorporates graph-based resource matching, autonomous blockchain-based settlements, and dynamic workflow structuring | |||
==3. Token Economics & Incentives== | |||
Golem Network (GNT) | |||
Taskers pay providers in GNT, based on supply-demand pricing; providers can cash out or exchange tokens | |||
A validator layer certifies trusted tasks to prevent malicious code execution . | |||
NuNet (NTX) | |||
Dynamically priced NTX payments are tied to actual compute performed; includes proof-of-receipt mechanisms to ensure task completion before payment | |||
Designed as a cross-chain token, initially launched on Ethereum and Cardano, meant to be chain-agnostic and adaptable | |||
==4. Target Users & Use Cases== | |||
Golem Network | |||
Geared toward developers and creatives needing burst compute for offline tasks—e.g., 3D rendering, encryption, compression, scientific simulations | |||
NuNet | |||
Targets broader IoT, AI, data, and ML ecosystems, enabling federated learning, edge processing, secure data orchestration, Web3 dApps, and smart-city systems . | |||
Prioritizes accessibility from a wide range of devices—PCs, smartphones, clusters, and even sensor networks | |||
==5. Governance & Decentralization Approach== | |||
Golem Network | |||
Continuously aims to reduce centralized dependencies (e.g., on Yagna), moving toward a trustless, fully peer-to-peer model; payment scalability using Ethereum, Polygon, and zkSync | |||
NuNet | |||
Emphasizes self-governance, decentralization in both infrastructure and ownership, with a structured transition toward public governance (NuNet Foundation, Solutions entity) | |||
Fully open-source under Apache 2.0, with a moving timeline toward decentralized control by 2026 ." | |||
| Line 9: | Line 92: | ||
* [[Nunet]] | * [[Nunet]] | ||
[[Category:P2P_Infrastructure]] | |||
[[Category: | |||
Latest revision as of 03:35, 18 June 2025
= "an open-source and decentralized platform where everyone can use and share each other's computing power without relying on centralized entities like cloud computing corporations".
URL = https://www.golem.network/
Characteristics
Via ChatGPT:
Here’s a detailed comparison of Golem Network and NuNet, highlighting their different visions, architectures, and operational models:
1. Core Concept & Vision
Golem Network
Positions itself as a decentralized supercomputer running on Ethereum, aimed primarily at batch tasks like rendering, data crunching, and simulations
Focus: letting providers rent out compute power, requesters submit jobs through smart contracts, and using validators to ensure trust and security medium.com
NuNet
Seeks to enable a compute-sharing marketplace that taps into idle CPU, GPU, IoT, and mobile resources globally—explicitly targeting AI, IoT, and edge computing use cases .
Envisions a “zero-waste paradigm” where unused compute cycles are harnessed for global benefit, with decentralized, governance-driven orchestration
2. Architecture & Workflow Coordination
Golem Network
Uses a match-and-split model: jobs are divided into subtasks, matched to providers, executed, and recombined—all orchestrated via smart contracts and off-chain coordination (e.g., Yagna)
Relatively simpler, modular architecture designed for batch processing, with gradual decentralization of prior centralized control nodes .
NuNet
Offers a rich, self-organizing control plane, where on-chain and off-chain layers co-exist.
Device Management Service (DMS) handles onboarding, identity, resource allocation, and decentralized orchestration across devices, similar to Kubernetes but fully decentralized
Incorporates graph-based resource matching, autonomous blockchain-based settlements, and dynamic workflow structuring
3. Token Economics & Incentives
Golem Network (GNT)
Taskers pay providers in GNT, based on supply-demand pricing; providers can cash out or exchange tokens
A validator layer certifies trusted tasks to prevent malicious code execution .
NuNet (NTX)
Dynamically priced NTX payments are tied to actual compute performed; includes proof-of-receipt mechanisms to ensure task completion before payment
Designed as a cross-chain token, initially launched on Ethereum and Cardano, meant to be chain-agnostic and adaptable
4. Target Users & Use Cases
Golem Network
Geared toward developers and creatives needing burst compute for offline tasks—e.g., 3D rendering, encryption, compression, scientific simulations
NuNet
Targets broader IoT, AI, data, and ML ecosystems, enabling federated learning, edge processing, secure data orchestration, Web3 dApps, and smart-city systems .
Prioritizes accessibility from a wide range of devices—PCs, smartphones, clusters, and even sensor networks
5. Governance & Decentralization Approach
Golem Network
Continuously aims to reduce centralized dependencies (e.g., on Yagna), moving toward a trustless, fully peer-to-peer model; payment scalability using Ethereum, Polygon, and zkSync
NuNet
Emphasizes self-governance, decentralization in both infrastructure and ownership, with a structured transition toward public governance (NuNet Foundation, Solutions entity)
Fully open-source under Apache 2.0, with a moving timeline toward decentralized control by 2026 ."