Modernism Post-Modernism Transmodernism: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
unknown (talk)
No edit summary
unknown (talk)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 57: Line 57:
|}
|}
<references/>
<references/>
[[Category:Integral Theory]]
[[Category:Civilizational Analysis]]
[[Category:P2P Theory]]

Latest revision as of 06:54, 14 July 2023

Comparison on the characteristics of Transmodernism, proposed by Michael Mehaffy:

Table

.. Modernism Post-Modernism Trans-Modernism
Form language Linear (abstraction,repetition) Fragmented/emegent (scripts, parametricism) Differentiation, pattern
Social agenda Altruism (naive) Cynicism, irony Capacity-building
Schema Top-down Intuitive Bottom-up/inductive pattern/combination
Artistic regine Industrial romantic sculptural Integrative (art/life)
Technology Elementary industrial Post-industrial/Fordist Biological/biophilic
Best practice methodology Ex-cathedra theory Deconstruction methods Evidence-based design
Guiding concepts Rationalism Irony Biophilia/biomimicry
Economics Socialist (top-down) Capitalist (ironic) Jacobsian (feedback systems, Mechanism design theory)
Philosophy Platonic [1] Post-structuralism Symmetric structuralist [2]
  1. See Salingaros and Mehaffy, "Geometrical Structuralism"
  2. There is a structure we can manage, because it is comprehensible. But there are limits - and powers - of language that we must understand so as to take full advantage. Language is a structure in nature, like any other (and more pervasive than we thought). This is its power, to address our challenges and enrich our experiences. See e.g. http://athensdialogues.chs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/WebObjects/athensdialogues.woa/45/wo/GjfKilUtZqFHjV7nh1pBO0/3.0.0.47.1.5.15.1.1.1.0.1