User:Ownut: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Why does a consumer ever pay Surplus value?)
(redirect)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hello, my name is Patrick Anderson.
#REDIRECT [[:User:Patrick-T-Anderson]]
 
This page should eventually be deleted.
My original work here was primarily describing [[User Owned]] organization/incorporation/governance.
 
I am also very interested in the  [[Mode Of Production Shootout]].
 
I am recently concentrating on proving "primitive accumulation of capital" ( http://Wikipedia.org/wiki/Primitive_accumulation_of_capital ) can be 'solved' at the point-of-sale by treating the payment of [[Surplus value]] as though it were an [[Invest]]ment from the [[Consumer]] who paid it.
 
When profit is thus understood to be a plea for growth from a dependent consumer, we can meaningfully route that payment toward the purchase of more [[Physical sources]] which must eventually (I don't know when or under what conditions) '''vest''' to the very same payer as real property ownership.
 
Treating [[Profit]], [[Economic rent]] and [[Interest]] in this manner causes an economic system to initially grow as non-owning consumers buy at a [[Price above cost]], but also causes that growth to naturally taper-off toward zero as each consumer gains sufficient ownership in the Material [[Means of production]].
 
When the Consumer of a good or service is also the owner of the [[Physical sources]] of that production, then [[Price]] == [[Cost]], and [[Profit]] == 0.
 
When [[Profit]] is not treated as a reward for the current owners, there is no artificial (and dangerous) incentive for infinite growth, nor is there the suicidal stance that abundance from any other source should be murdered, stopped, deleted, hidden, etc.
 
 
== Contact ==
Email: AGNUcius@Gmail.com
 
Home: http://patware.FreeShell.org

Latest revision as of 17:02, 7 September 2019

This page should eventually be deleted.