Talk:Blog Content Curation and Original Writing Guidelines: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Thanks [[User:Stacco Troncoso|Stacco Troncoso]] ([[User talk:Stacco Troncoso|talk]]) 13:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC) | Thanks [[User:Stacco Troncoso|Stacco Troncoso]] ([[User talk:Stacco Troncoso|talk]]) 13:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
In fact the intention is to avoid mixing "secure" (HTTPS) and "insecure" (HTTP) content - since the wiki is on HTTPS, browsers should (and most do) ignore inline HTTP content, thus the need to include external resources through an HTTPS cache/gateway. I would rather have all relevant images included through HTTPS if the origin sites support it, or directly copied to the wiki - but this last option might be unsustainable, size-wise, in the long term. | |||
A side effect of using a cache is to avoid hammering other people's servers from an image inclusion in a popular article, keeping bandwidth leeching to a minimum. | |||
A compromise we'll try to pursue is to take all http:// image SRCs and translate them automatically into https://i0.wp.com/ URLs, but that's not very high in our priority list ATM. | |||
[[User:Codehead|Codehead]] ([[User talk:Codehead|talk]]) 13:01, 28 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:01, 28 November 2016
i0.wp.com
Stacco, could you explain why you ask people to use i0.wp.com ?
Thanks Simon Grant (talk) 05:39, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Simon. This was suggested by our SysAdmin, Javier Arturo Rodríguez for images that didn't have https. I would prefer the process to be automatized somehow to make the process easier for blog contributors and encourage more participation. Maybe Javier can suggest something.
Thanks Stacco Troncoso (talk) 13:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
In fact the intention is to avoid mixing "secure" (HTTPS) and "insecure" (HTTP) content - since the wiki is on HTTPS, browsers should (and most do) ignore inline HTTP content, thus the need to include external resources through an HTTPS cache/gateway. I would rather have all relevant images included through HTTPS if the origin sites support it, or directly copied to the wiki - but this last option might be unsustainable, size-wise, in the long term.
A side effect of using a cache is to avoid hammering other people's servers from an image inclusion in a popular article, keeping bandwidth leeching to a minimum.
A compromise we'll try to pursue is to take all http:// image SRCs and translate them automatically into https://i0.wp.com/ URLs, but that's not very high in our priority list ATM. Codehead (talk) 13:01, 28 November 2016 (UTC)