View source for Sociotechnical Skills in the Case of Arduino

'''* Article: [[Produsage]] in hybrid networks: sociotechnical skills in the case of [[Arduino]]. Stefano De Paolia; Cristiano Storni. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 17: 1, 31 — 52'''

URL = http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713599880


=Abstract=

"In this paper we investigate produsage using Actor-Network Theory with a focus on
(produsage) skills, their development, and transformation. We argue that produsage is
not a model that determines a change in the traditional consumption/production
paradigm through a series of essential preconditions (such as open participation, peer-
sharing, or common ownership). Rather, we explain produsage as the open-ended result
of a series of heterogeneous actor-networking strategies. In this view, the so-called
preconditions do not explain produsage but have to be explained along with its
establishment as an actor-network. Drawing on this approach, we discuss a case study of
an open hardware project: the Arduino board, and we develop a perspective that maps
the skills of human and non-human entities in produsage actor-networks, showing how
skills are symmetrical, relational, and circulating."


=Excerpt=

From the conclusion:

"We began this paper with a critique of essentialism and reductionism in
characterizing produsage and we developed a non-essentialist counter-
argument based on ANT. We are aware that essentialist approaches have
their own strengths and that they can produce accounts usually based on
definite sets of properties that define specific and apparently stable models.
To the contrary, our approach subverts some of these assumptions and
proposes a perspective to explain what is usually taken as an explanation.

For us, a relational approach is a much-needed step toward a full
appreciation of the phenomenon of produsage that complements more
traditional views.

With this in mind, we have mapped the circulation of skills in the case study
of the Arduino open board, showing that elements such as sharing, open
participation, and common ownership (the characters of essentialist explana-
tions) do not necessarily explain users’ new skills. On the contrary, these
characters depend on the distribution and circulation of skills among humans
and non-humans in actor-networks. Our argument on the symmetry,
relationality and circulation of skills deepens this perspective and opens up
further exploration of the relationships between new emerging practices and
technologies.

We can further evaluate the contribution of our work by comparing it
briefly with a previous argument on skills in produsage. According to Bruns
(2007) a defining character of produsage is the emergence of a new generation
of users who have (design) skills and want to use them. Moreover, produsage
communities welcome newcomers with the ‘‘appropriate’’ skills. Finally,
Bruns considers that it is important that these skills are also taught in
schools so that citizens are prepared to participate in produsage. Although we
share these views, we also see how such an argument produces a
discriminatory bias between humans and non-humans and renders skills as
essentially human. Moreover, skills are understood in essential terms (as
something that you own or deliver) and not as a relational articulation
between users and their tools. In this sense, we believe we might be misled in
assuming that produsage implies en-skilled users.

First, as much as the sleeping policemen slow down the traffic, produsage
artifacts relate with different users to enact a broad range of skills. The
breadboard that can be mounted on top of the Arduino enacts a skill that was
previously required on the side of users. However, using the breadboard
minimizes the need for soldering tools and the relational skills that derive
from associating with them. There is therefore a circulation of skills that is
always a symmetrical trade-off between humans and non-humans.

Further, the claim that produsage communities are permeable has, for
example, been criticized by De Paoli et al. (2008) who showed that FOSS
communities can also be impermeable to skilled users/programmers and
their software. The discussion/confusion about the trademarked name is a
further example that there is also an impermeable aspect in produsage that
needs to be discussed too: no matter how skilled you are, you can copy the
board, modify it as you like but you are not allowed to use the Arduino
name improperly. Moreover, your participation depends on specific artifacts
such as a computer or the Internet access (which should not be taken for
granted).

Technology and design play a key role in both inscribing certain skills and in
inviting certain other skills and interests to be developed. However, far from
making a universal claim, we have also seen how the most skilled users are
those who engaged more critically with the original Arduino design and ended
up creating a separation in the produsage network whereby the Arduino
model*definitely a produsage case in the eye of the authors of this article*is
re-appropriated by others or even rejected as not open enough. Much research
is needed in order to fully appreciate the sociotechnical dynamics that describe
produsage. Our ANT view on produsage, our argument on skills, and our
point in looking at what involved actors define in their own terms are intended
as a preliminary way to tackle these challenges. This paper opens up a space
for follow-up works where the innovative factors of the produsage productive
paradigm (such as the issues related with innovation, labor organization, and
different types of users) can be more explicitly framed using an ANT
perspective. Similarly, an ANT-informed evaluation framework and a number
of criteria for sociotechnical skills transfer could also be developed and
eventually enrich the current debate on produsage."


=More Information=

From the same author:

* Article: S. De Paoli, M. Teli and V. D’Andrea, 2008. ‘‘[[Free and Open Source Licenses in Community Life]]: Two
empirical cases,’’ First Monday, 13(10), p. 19. Available online at: http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/
index.php/fm/article/view/2064/2030 




[[Category:Articles]]

[[Category:Labor]]

[[Category:Manufacturing]]

[[Category:Peerproduction]]