Good Living

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search


René Ramírez:

"Good Living is based not only in “having” but mainly in “being”, “do” and “feel”: in living good and living fully. If we consider that the definition of good living entails being aware that this is a complex, live, non-lineal concept, it's historically built, and as such is in a constant process of re-signification, then we can try to sketch what good living or sumak kawsay means: meeting needs, the achievement of a quality of dignified life and death, to love and be loved and the healthy blossom of everyone, in peace and harmony with nature, to prolong indefinitely human cultures and biodiversity.

Good living or sumak kawsay implies having time for contemplation, friendship, emancipation, the amplification of the possibilities of socialization as well as the amplification and flowering of real freedoms, opportunities, capacities and potentials for both individuals and collectives so they can allow simultaneously what society, territories, the diverse collective identities and everyone – seen as human being/particular and universal collective at the same time – cherish as object of a desirable life (both material and subjectively, without producing any kind of domination over another human being). The concept of Good Living force us to rebuild the public and the common to recognize, understand and value each other - and nature -, as diverse but equal, so the possibilty of reciprocity and mutual recognition can prosper, along with the viability of self realization and the construction of a shared social future." (René Ramírez, (Good) Living as the wealth of nations, Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales, 1st edition, Quito.)


The Good Living policy in Ecuador

From an interview with René Ramírez, Ecuador’s National Secretary of Planning and Development, by the New Left Project:

"The concept of ‘Good Living’ is one of the central pillars of President Correa’s ‘Citizens’ Revolution’. What is meant by the concept?

The first thing to say is that the concept of ‘Good Living’ or Sumak Kawsay (in the Quechua language) arises out of the political struggles of the people. This is important to emphasise because generally proposals come from intellectuals, academics, the UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean for example, but this concept comes from people’s traditions and is now enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. Clearly it represents a fusion between a Western outlook, from an Aristotelian perspective, which merges with an indigenous perspective, the Sumak Kawsay (‘Good Living’). Ecuador is not Bolivia. Ecuador does not have such a large indigenous population, it contains a larger mestizo population, but it coexists within a plurinational state, which contains about 14 indigenous communities. We believe that the world does not need development alternatives but alternatives to development. It is necessary to create a completely different world.

Perhaps one of the greatest failings of the ‘existing’ Socialist countries was that they never put into question the issue of progress, they never questioned the concept of growth. We believe that it is necessary to do this. It goes beyond concepts such as welfare and wellbeing. When you translate this to Spanish, wellbeing is only part of life . The concept of ‘well living’ is broader than that. We are looking for methods that allow us to better measure ‘“good living’” beyond traditional indicators such as GDP per capita, income or consumption. We have developed an indicator in Ecuador called ‘life expectancy of a healthy and well lived life’ which has to do with an attribute that Economics has forgotten about. Economics deals with public, private and common goods but is has forgotten about what Aristotle calls “relational attributes”, which relates to the questions of how we create a society and how human beings relate to nature. We can take this into account by measuring, not through monetary means, but by measuring time. In order to have a good life the first thing is to be. We are also developing another indicator that has to do with what we might call a more “green” perspective, which is Nature’s life expectancy. One of the best indicators used by ecological economics to measure environmental degradation is deforestation. But it is not the same to deforest an environmental space that is mega diverse than to cut a planted forest. That is why we are calculating the lifetime of a given environmental space, or in other words nature life expectancy implicit in economic development. We are advancing in a virtuous relation associated with the concept of ‘good living’ that has to do with peace and with the survival of indigenous cultures, about participation in public affairs and collective action, and ultimately the relationship between humans and nature. So, it is a change of philosophy that implies a re-think of our public policies." (