Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wealth Acknowledgment Systems"

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'Eli, I'm not sure your added remarks are correct, p2p is generalized non-reciprocal exchange, but I don't see that as necessarily excluding W.A.S., which may be reputation sche...')
 
 
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
Michel
 
Michel
 +
 +
--
 +
 +
Michel,
 +
 +
I have removed my remarks until I can clarify (to myself) this point.
 +
 +
[[User:Elifarley|Elifarley]] 09:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:58, 9 November 2009

Eli,

I'm not sure your added remarks are correct,

p2p is generalized non-reciprocal exchange, but I don't see that as necessarily excluding W.A.S., which may be reputation schemes for example

similarly, if RBE is not p2p, and I don't believe it necessarily is, and if it needs some kind of accounting of its flows and measures of reciprocity, then also, it could need W.A.S.

systems without money and barter, could still use W.A.S., I thought that was the whole point of the proposal,

Michel

--

Michel,

I have removed my remarks until I can clarify (to myself) this point.

Elifarley 09:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)