Difference between revisions of "Power Law"

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
  
 +
'''The Power Law refers to the unequal distribution of influence within networks.'''
  
'''The Power Law refers to the unequal distribution of influence within networks.'''
+
 
 +
=Definition=
 +
 
 +
"In systems where many people are free to choose between many options, a small subset of the whole will get a disproportionate amount of traffic (or attention, or income), even if no members of the system actively work towards such an outcome. The very act of choosing, spread widely enough and freely enough, creates a power law distribution."
 +
[http://shirky.com/writings/powerlaw_weblog.html]
 +
 
 +
=Commentary by Clay Shirky=
  
 
Classic discusion of how the power law operates in blogs, and why it is inevitable, by one of the most influential commentators, by Clay Shirky.
 
Classic discusion of how the power law operates in blogs, and why it is inevitable, by one of the most influential commentators, by Clay Shirky.

Revision as of 06:34, 9 May 2006

The Power Law refers to the unequal distribution of influence within networks.


Definition

"In systems where many people are free to choose between many options, a small subset of the whole will get a disproportionate amount of traffic (or attention, or income), even if no members of the system actively work towards such an outcome. The very act of choosing, spread widely enough and freely enough, creates a power law distribution." [1]

Commentary by Clay Shirky

Classic discusion of how the power law operates in blogs, and why it is inevitable, by one of the most influential commentators, by Clay Shirky.

URL = http://shirky.com/writings/powerlaw_weblog.html

"A persistent theme among people writing about the social aspects of weblogging is to note (and usually lament) the rise of an A-list, a small set of webloggers who account for a majority of the traffic in the weblog world. This complaint follows a common pattern we've seen with MUDs, BBSes, and online communities like Echo and the WELL. A new social system starts, and seems delightfully free of the elitism and cliquishness of the existing systems. Then, as the new system grows, problems of scale set in. Not everyone can participate in every conversation. Not everyone gets to be heard. Some core group seems more connected than the rest of us, and so on.

Prior to recent theoretical work on social networks, the usual explanations invoked individual behaviors: some members of the community had sold out, the spirit of the early days was being diluted by the newcomers, et cetera. We now know that these explanations are wrong, or at least beside the point. What matters is this: Diversity plus freedom of choice creates inequality, and the greater the diversity, the more extreme the inequality."

Michel Bauwens discusses the power law in chapter five of the online manuscript on peer to peer, at [2]