Difference between revisions of "Chan, Adrian"

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replaced content with "See Adrian Chan")
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
See [[Adrian Chan]]
'''Adrian Chan is a researcher specializing in social software and 'relations'.'''
Information provided by the author.
'''Social software blog''' at
'''Index to writings''' in pdf format, at http://www.gravity7.com/articles_investigations.html
'''Index to social software postings''', at http://www.gravity7.com/articles_observations.html
"My project Venn is:
--'''Proximities.''' I believe tech of communication fundamentally changes our
proximity to one another, meaning we now need a sociology of proximity based
not on spatial copresence but on presence negotiation (access to people,
issues of "absence"), and built on temporality not space (routines, an
understanding of "open states of talk", durations (the persistence of
relations, norms, events, and communication over time). TIME is the least
understood dimension of any connective technology.
--'''Interaction dynamics.''' What happens when 2 or more people interact through
a technology. Issues of communication (information capture, archiving,
access, search, persistence, privacy, public/private). Issues of interaction
(gestural and paralinguistic handling, ambiguity, intimacies, timing, and of
course self-presentation). I am starting a project I would like to be an A-Z
of pschological experiences and transformations. Using the DSM (psychiatric
diagnostic manual) and my own take on psych, which is biased towards British
School of Object Relations, Transactional Analysis, Group dynamics, I'm
interested in how SSNs, IM, chat, vidchat, discussions, blogs, email, bec
they are asynch or near-synch, screen identities, defer confirmations and
acknowledgments, permit "unratified participants" (eg lurkers), disrupt
episodic talk, screw w/ turn taking, authority and position, etc. I have
ideas like "borderline or narcissists love SSN's!" You get the picture.
Presence is co-produced by its technology....
--'''Social systems.''' Culture, online community, groups, networks, p2p. All of
these involve: action coordination; in/formal communication; transactions;
trust; boundaries; rhythms; speech as text. For this I use anthro and
sociology, mostly french/german/british. Some ethnomethodology (eg. XOX
PARC). I'm big on applying Niklas Luhmann's systems theory here. Goffman,
Giddens, and Habermas. A bit of Foucault, Bourdieu, and Habermas. A bit of
Kevin Kelly/Negroponte/Linked/Six Degrees stuff. Some SNA (social network
analysis, tho it's too topological and never describes th nature of a
relation, only its traffic).
--'''Talk systems.''' I profoundly believe that much of mediated communication and
interaction must be understood as Talk. It's linguistically-mediated
exchange. As such, I believe it has to address habermas' three truth claims:
facticity, sincerity, and normative rightfulness. We need to understand the
stretch of talk, span of activity, sequencing and seriality of activity, in
a mediated talk. I separate communication tools and interaction tools, the
former being about capturing/archiving/searching/presenting contributions;
the latter being about handling meanings, implications, emotional
expression, timing, context, theme, and interaction dynamics of
interactions. Communication tool is a tribe discussion. Private message is
an interaction tool.
--'''Socially structured content.''' This is a new project, inspired by canter's
structured blogging (which is baked into the GoingOn platform). So I have a
framework of content types, their presentation modules, their sort by,
filter by, link to organization. All based on idea that the designer can
only influence participation. But that any info onscreen informs what
happens as populations grow, over time. In a word, if LinkedIn were to add
pictures, shit would change...

Latest revision as of 07:51, 23 July 2011