Category:P2P Law
= This new section covers mainly legal blocks and facilitators for cooperative, p2p and commons-oriented, sharing-based practices and solutions.
Introduction
Tommasso Fattori:
"We also need a more general recognition and a flexible system of legal protection for commoning activities and for the products of collective creativity: the state and institutions must take an active role in supporting commoning and to support the creation of new Commons.
This active role must translate into forms of Public - Common Partnership, where the institutions enable and empower the collective/social peer-creation of common value. Governments could also provide seed funding, incentives and grants for Commons and commoning, just as it currently provides research and development support and assistance to businesses and corporations.
The drafting of one of more Charters of Commons must offer a broad range of forms of protection, which would go for example from the definition of special statutes for the safeguarding of biodiversity or of traditional knowledge to laws defending the collective interests of digital communities. At the same time a series of legal tools aiming to keep the results of collective creation under the control of the collectivity which produced them have been built and invented by the commoners themselves, for example by altering the legal tools which were originally designed to protect private property, redirecting them towards the protection of Commons, as has been the case with GPL and CC licenses, the product of a transformation and a turning onto their head of the logic of laws governing copyright.
The legal recognition of the sphere of Commons must lead to a delegation of authority and power by the state to commons-based institutions. That is to say, the constitution of self-regulating commons-based institutions must be authorized, protected and legally recognised (starting with the recognition of those which already exist.), through which commoners can protect, produce and reproduce Commons and common value.
Current debates (and experiments) focus on Trusts, Foundations, For-Benefit Institutions etc. Commons Trusts are normally considered legal entities responsible for protecting shared assets, and which have a fiduciary duty to preserve natural and material commons - such as natural systems, water, air, land, and biodiversity - and to protect, regenerate or create social, cultural, digital and intellectual Commons, such as Wikipedia and the Internet itself. Such trusts can be located either inside the boundaries of one state or be trans-border, according to the size and range of the resource and/or of its relative community of interest. Finally, it is probably not sufficient to stop at meta-institutions designed to preserve and protect the common destiny of a Commons over time and prevent its alienation. Just as it is true that commoning normally produces use value which cannot be accounted for in monetary terms (values which are part of the range of positive social or environmental externalities) one should construct a special legal form which could recognise and protect a similar type of enterprise or “project” (a common social enterprise) and protect a similar form of production of use value of collective use, which will help build another type of economy."
Key Initiatives
Worthy of Support:
- "The Commons Law Project is an ecological governance initiative that Professor Weston and I are pursuing in cooperation with The University of Iowa Center for Human Rights (UICHR) and the Vermont Law School Environmental Law Center (VLS-ELC). Rights-based and commons driven, the Project seeks to recover and refurbish the law of the commons from Roman times, the Magna Carta, and points before and since to put forward a new contemporary law of the ecological commons grounded in human rights.
- The Sustainable Economies Law Center from Janelle Orsi seeks to diminish legal constraints on human cooperation and sharing. See: Janelle Orsi on Legal Challenges to Collaborative Consumption and Sharing
- The Constituent Assembly of the Commons in Italy
- The Sharelex group of sharing lawyers in Europe
Please read:
Hot Projects
- Common Accord: potentially enabling Smart Contracts
- Ethereum: potentially enabling Decentralized Autonomous Organizations
- Swarm: crypto-equity investing
Key Topics
Technology and the Law
From Primavera De Filippi on Integration of Law and Computer Technology:
"The marriage of law and technology in the late 20th and early 21st century can be divided into three phases.
Phase one involved digitizing information itself: taking paper and ink and storing as computer readable information. That phase is well under way: copies of cases, statutes, and regulations have been available on-line for decades in large databases, accessible at first for a fee, and now mostly for free. Yet, there is a big difference between digitized information (that can be stored and displayed on a computer) and semantically meaningful information (that can be also processed and understood by a computer).
Phase two has involved automating decision-making. Much legal informatics research to date has focused on transforming legal provisions into computer code. This is a hard project for many reasons, including the ambiguity of the human language and the need for legal norms to be flexible and fact dependent. Despite these challenges (and limitations) government institutions and businesses worldwide increasingly rely on rule-based representations of specific knowledge domains - such as health care, tax and financial regulations - for automated decision-making (see e.g. specific tools for taxation, accounting and credit-score assessment).
Phase three - which is just beginning - involves self-enforcing smart contracts. We are moving quickly towards a system where technology will not only aid in decision-making but will also be employed to enforce rules. A notable example can be found in Digital Rights Management systems which incorporate the provisions of copyright law into technological measures of protection. But technology can also implement its own technical rules, which do not reflect any underlying legal rule. In order to be legally enforceable, these rules need to be wrapped-up into a legal framework capable of making smart contracts actionable under the law. A lot of work has yet to be done in that area." ([1])
Facilitating Sharing and Cooperation through the Law
- Shareable Magazine's 20-part series on policies that foster resource sharing, co-production, and mutual aid in cities: http://www.shareable.net/blog/policies-for-a-shareable-city
- Crowdfunding and the Law. Janelle Orsi, SELC
- How the Law Is Used To Stifle the Sharing Economy. Chris Laroche.
- Legal Issues Raised by the Sharing Economy
The Law and the Commons
- Tommaso Fattori, proposals for Commons and politics/policy:
- Towards a Legal Framework for the Commons
- The Public - Commons Partnership and the Commonification of that which is Public
- On the importance of Social Charters: "Several legal frameworks exist for the protection of commons, including public domain law, public trust, human rights, and international treaties and conventions. However, these legal frameworks pertain mainly to the provision and allocation of public goods, thus requiring sovereign approval and oversight. Social charters stem from the tradition of customary or natural law, which means that they are created by the users and producers of a commons and are not dependent upon state consent." [2]
See also:
- Commons Law
- Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law
- Global Legal Commons
- Law of the Commons
- Legal Commons and Social Commons
- Legal Form of the Commons
- Open Law
- Open Source Law
Legal Facilitation for Open Hardware and Production
- Open Source Licensing as a Legal and Economic Modality for the Dissemination of Renewable Energy
- Opening Hardware through Legal Tools ; Recommended Open Hardware Licenses
Personhood of Corporations
- How Corporations Became People ; John Bonifaz on Revoking Corporate Personhood
- Outlawing the For-Profit Corporate Form (via the Program on Corporations, Law and Democracy of the late Richard Grossman)
- Using Corporate Governance Law to Benefit All Stakeholders
Background reading:
- The Divine Right of Capital: Dethroning the Corporate Aristocracy. By Marjorie Kelly. Berrett-Koehler, 2001.
New Commons-Friendly Enterprise Formats
- Open Companies
- Open Company Legal Research Group
- Intro to For-Benefit Corporations and other Fourth Sector Organizations
See our special section on Open Company Formats !
Protecting Indigenous / Traditional Knowledge
- Bioculture vs Biopiracy: Alternative Approaches for Protecting Indigenous Traditional Knowledge
- Imagining a Traditional Knowledge Commons ; Implementing a Traditional Knowledge Commons
- Patenting Traditional Knowledge ; Protecting Community Traditional Knowledge Rights
- Traditional Knowledge ; Traditional Knowledge Commons ; Traditional Knowledge Commons License ; Traditional Knowledge Digital Library
Key Resources
Key Articles
- The Life of the Law Online by David R. Johnson First Monday, Volume 11, Number 2 - 6 February 2006 (recommended by David Bollier)
- Massimo De Angelis: Commons Rights Are Not Legal Rights
- Legal basics for designers
In other languages
- Beni comuni. Contributo per una teoria giuridica, 2015 Paru dans Costituzionalismo.it http://www.costituzionalismo.it/articoli/492/
Key Audio/Video
Key Books
- Greg Lastowka. Virtual Justice: The New Laws of Online Worlds.
- U.S.A. focus: Practicing Law in the Sharing Economy: Helping People Build Cooperatives, Social Enterprise, and Local Sustainable Economies. Janelle Orsi. SELC, 2012
Key Courses
- Digital Citizens Basics, an online course on digital rights and duties, proposed by Marco Fioretti [3]
Key People
- David Bollier, Commons Law Project
- Carolina Botero, Colombia
- Eben Moglen, the Free Software Foundation legal counsel
- Janelle Orsi, Sustainable Economies Law Center
Pages in category "P2P Law"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 638 total.
(previous page) (next page)M
- Marco Civil
- Margot Kaminski on the Capture of International Intellectual Property Law through the U.S. Trade Regime
- Mattereum
- Meaning of the Commons in Institutional Perspective
- Michael Yaziji on Rethinking the Structure of Corporations
- Model Community Bill of Rights Template for Occupy Communities
- Model Distributed Collaborative Organizations
- Model Law for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations
- Moritz Renner on Societal Constitutionalism and the Global Economy
- Morshed Mannan
- My User Agreement
N
- Naples Council Resolution of 2016 on Occupied Buildings as Common Goods
- Naples' Government Resolution no. 446 - 2016 on the Identification of Urban Spaces as Commons
- Natalia Greene on the Rights of Nature
- Natalia Lukaszewicz on the Maker Movement and Patent Law
- Natural Justice
- Nature on the Board
- Neos Labs
- New Laws of Online Worlds
- Non-Judicial Punishment
- Nondominium
- Nordic Everyman Rights
O
- Occupied Buildings in Naples as Common Goods
- Occupy Law Enforcement
- Occupy the Law
- On Common Goods
- On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice
- On-Chain and Off-Chain Governance of Blockchain Technologies
- Online Censorship Regulations
- Online Dispute Resolution
- Online Platforms as Transnational Rule-Makers
- Open Act
- Open Companies
- Open Company Legal Research Group
- Open Counsel
- Open Democracy and Citizen Movements' Role in the Icelandic Constitution
- Open Discussion About Liquid Unions
- Open Law
- Open Source Assurance Agreement
- Open Source Food Code
- Open Source Law
- Open Source Law Weekly Open Source Digest
- Open Source Legal System
- Open Source Legal Systems
- Open Source Licenses Summarized and Explained in Plain English
- Open Source Licensing as a Legal and Economic Modality for the Dissemination of Renewable Energy
- Open Sourcing Obsolete Products By Law
- Open Unified Registry with Public License
- Open-Source Distributed Ledger Platform for Legal Agreements Between Businesses
- Opening Borders Project
- Opening Hardware through Legal Tools
- Opposite of Property
- Ordo-Communal State
- Ordo-Communalism
- Organic Code for the Social Knowledge and Innovation Economy of Ecuador
- Ostrom Contracts
- Outlawing the For-Profit Corporate Form
P
- P2P Disruption and the Law
- P2P Licensing
- Pando
- Participatory Legislation
- Patent and Copyright Rely More Consistently on Property Rules than Property Law Itself
- Paul Cienfuegos on How Local Communities Are Dismantling Corporate Rule
- Paul Cienfuegos on the Community Rights Movement
- PBS News Hour on Benefit Corporations for Positive Community Impact
- Peer Production ToS
- Peer-to-Peer Rights Fund
- Peoples Sustainability Treaties
- Permission-Based Planetary Ownership
- Piracy Paradigm
- Pirate Code
- Planting Justice
- Platformization of Regulation
- Player Generated Content – End-User Licence Agreements
- Plaza Podemos
- Podcasting Legal Guide
- Policies To Support Local Manufacturing
- Policy and Legal Obstacles to Community Composting
- Policy Levers to Protect Children from Social Media
- Polycentric Law
- Polytopian Jurisdictions
- Potato Park
- Practicing Law in the Sharing Economy
- Priority Intervention Neighborhoods and Zones - Lisbon
- Program on Corporations, Law and Democracy
- Proof of Existence
- Property Law
- Property Meeting the Challenge of the Commons
- Property Rights
- Proposal for Modernizing Labor Laws for Twenty-First-Century Work
- Proposed Constitutional Amendment To Introduce the Commons in the French Constitution
- Protocollary Ecological Institutions
- Public - Common Partnership
- Public - Commons Partnership and the Commonification of that which is Public
- Pure Legal Code
R
- Reciprocity as Mutual Recognition
- Recommended Open Hardware Licenses
- ReConstitutional Convention
- Referendum To Expropriate Big Private Housing-Companies in Berlin
- Reflections on Peer-to-Peer Law
- Regenerating the Human Right to a Clean and Healthy Environment in the Commons Renaissance
- Regional Law on the Commons in Tuscany
- Regression to the Code
- Regulating Bitcoin and Block Chain Derivatives
- Regulating Blockchain
- Regulation of the Urban Commons in Bologna
- Regulation of the Urban Commons in Naples
- Regulation of the Urban Commons in Rome
- Regulation of the Urban Commons in Turin
- Regulation of Urban Commons - Italy
- Regulation Room
- Regulatory Equivalence
- Reinventing Law for the Commons
- Research on Co-operatives, Mutuals and Social Enterprise
- Researching Ownership and Legal Title
- Resilience Force Proposal
- Resilient Communities Legal Cafe
- Resurgence and Repression of the Commons Movement in Italy
- Reuben Grinberg on the Legality of Bitcoin
- Richard Grossman
- Richard Susskind on the Internet and the Administration of Justice
- Right of Public Access and Freedom to Roam - Sweden
- Right to Common as a Basic Human Right
- Right To Common in the Flanders
- Right To Pooling
- Right to Roam
- Right to Self Government
- Right To the Co-City
- Rights of Nature
- Rise of Digital Common Law
- Roberto Verzola on the Counterproductive Laws that Induce Artificial Scarcity
- Role of Trusteeship in Earth Governance
- Roman Property Law
- Rule of Law Engine
- Ryhope Lab
S
- San Francisco Urban Agriculture Law
- Sarah Gold on the Need for Peer-Based and Techno-Savvy Citizenship
- Scale of Commonality
- Scale of Communality
- Secret History of the Magna Carta
- Seeds and the Laws Against the Commons
- Self Owning Land
- Self-Owning Land
- Seoul Metropolitan Government Ordinance on the Promotion of Sharing
- Service Organizations for the Commons
- SFLC Guide to Legal Issues and GPL Compliance
- Shared Property Tax System
- Sharelex
- ShareLex
- Sharing Companies Should Be Cooperative T-Corporations
- Sharing Economy City Policy Brief
- Shifting the Deeper Structures of Regulation Toward Sustainable Commons and User Access
- Should Trees Have Standing
- Smart Contracts
- Smart Transactions
- Social Charter for Assemblies of the Commons
- Social Charter for Smart Platforms
- Social Code
- Social Movements and the Politics of the Commons in the Italian South
- Social Movements as Constituent Power
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- Somerset Rules
- Sources of Commons Law
- Special Digital Economic Zones
- Stable Climate as a Common Heritage of Humankind
- Startup Exemption for Crowdfunding
- Study Group on Legal, Social and Economic Aspects of Cryptoledger-Based Technologies
- Study of Commons Legal Institutions
- Subsistence Commons in India
- Subsistence Commons in the Global South
- Sunil Abraham
- Supporting a Responsive and Agile Regulatory Environment for the Collaborative Economy
- Survey of U.S. Income Taxation and its Ramifications on Cryptocurrencies
- Sustainable Economies Law Center
- Sydney Car-Sharing Policy
- System of Rice Intensification and Its International Community of Practice
- Szabo's Law of Blockchain Governance
T
- T-Corporations
- Tactical Chartering
- Tactical Chartering Manifesto
- Tara Mulqueen
- Technical Form of Regulation
- Tenant Rights to Generate Solar Power on Rented Roofs
- Terms of Service Contracts for Peer Production
- Territories and the Right to Food and Water
- The Satoshi Oath for Blockchain Developers
- Theories of the Commons
- Think Outside the Boss
- Thom Hartmann on Corporate Personhood
- Thomas Linzey on Nature's Rights and Self-Owning Land
- Thomas Linzey on the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund
- Three-Dimensional Printing Open License
- TLDR Legal
- Tom Mahon on Technology and Social Justice
- Toma Parte
- Toward a Global Social Contract
- Toward a Legal System in Tune with Nature and Community
- Towards a Basic Income Law
- Towards a Legal Framework for the Commons
- Towards a Legal Theory of the Commons and the Common Good