Category:Business
Light beats heavy. Open beats closed. Free beats paid. Good beats evil.
- Umair Haque [1]
No matter who you are, most of the smartest people work for someone else.
- Bill Joy [2]
This section collates material related to peer production, P2P Business developments, and P2P Economics issues.
* Micro-economically:
Externally, the business world is engaging/moving towards an adaptation to productive communities, while productive communities are building their own Phyles
Internally, businesses are starting to engage in Social Business Design, by moving from Systems of Record to Systems of Engagement.
* Macro-economically:
We are moving towards Open Business Models, and a commons-oriented global economy. Profit-Maximisation can no longer be contained by pure external state regulation, but needs new forms, that embed the profit function into higher ethical requirements, that are embedded in the very corporate structures, while at the same time, new economic forms are created directly by autonomous productive communities, so that they can maintain their independence.
More here, in our Category: Economics
Introduction and Visualization
Recommended reading:
Typology:
The business cycle for the material economy [3]:
- Incubation: Where do the basic "raw materials" come from?
- Production: How are goods and services produced?
- Exchange: How do goods and services move from production to use?
- Distribution: How is the consumption and use of goods and services organized?
- Allocation: How is surplus generated in the economic cycle used? How does surplus re-enter and reinvigorate the cycle?
Articles:
- Michel Bauwens: An Introduction to Open Business Models. OSBR, April 2008
- Laurel Papworth: Social Media Business Models, outlines 22 revenue streams in 4 quadrants, with "member to member" corresponding to "peer to peer"
- Internet Business Models: typology by Michael Rappa.
Also:
- How Low Participation Costs make Peer Production Inevitable
- Markets are inefficient for non-rival goods. Josh Farley
- In peer production, the interests of capitalists and entrepreneurs are no longer aligned
- Can peer production make washing machines?. Graham Seaman.
Please note that the issue of physical peer production or "open design communities for physical production" is monitored separately in this section
For inspiration: Principles of Ethical Social Entreprises (Franco Papeschi & Tory Dunn)
What we Know about Open/Free and Commons-Based Business Models
- Business Models for the Commons ; Business Models to Support Content Commons
- Open Business Models ; Open Business
- Open Film Business Models ; Open Music Business Models
- Free Software Business Models ; Open Source Business Models; Open Source Software Business Models
- Free Business Models
- Open Source Hardware Business Models ; Open Hardware Business Models
More here, in our new section on Open Business Models
Key Initiatives
- Corporation 20/20: What would a corporation look like that was designed to seamlessly integrate both social and financial purpose? Corporation 20/20 is a new multi-stakeholder initiative that seeks to answer this question. Its goal is to develop and disseminate corporate designs where social purpose moves from the periphery.
- JAS Economics: principles for grassroots economics
|}
Comparative Table: The Logic of the Market versus the Logic of the Commons
| Market | Commons | |
| Focus |
What can I sell?Exchange value |
What do we need?Use value |
| Core beliefs | Scarcity | Plenty |
| Homo oeconomicus | Homo cooperans | |
| It's about resources (allocation). | It's about us. | |
| Governance | Market-State | Polycentric / Peer-to-Peer Governance |
| Decision making | hierarchical | horizontal |
| Command (Power, Law, Violence) | Consensus, Free Cooperation, self-organization | |
| Social relationships | Centralization of power (monopoly) |
Decentralization of power(autonomy) |
| Property | Possession | |
| Access to rival resources | Limited by boundaries & rules defined by owner | Limited by boundaries & rules defined by usergroups |
| Access to nonrival resources | Made scarce (to ensure profitability) | Open access (to ensure social equity) |
| Use rights | Granted by owner | Co-decided by user groups |
| Dominant strategy | Out-compete | Out-cooperate |
| Results | ||
| For the resources |
ErosionEnclosure |
Conservation Reproduction & Multiplication |
| For the people | Exlusion & Participation | Inclusion & Emancipation |
Visualization
A map with a conceptual overview of the peer to peer business space. Every concept in the map is searchable via our wiki search box on the upper left.
See also:
- the New Economy mindmap
- a really superb introduction to the new economy in prezi by Arthur Brock: http://prezi.com/xmzld_-wayho/new-economy-new-wealth/
Key Resources | |
|
Key Articles
Also: Corporate Reform
Key Books
Also:
Key External Articles
|
Key Podcasts/WebcastsPodcasts:
See: P2P Videos on Business and Economics, list compiled in 2008 Here's a primer on economimc growth, that every economist and business person should watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sqwd_u6HkMo&feature=player_embedded# Key Tags
|
Citations | |
Long CitationsCitizens United in Cooperative and Participative Entrepreneurship"Citizens unite to compete with multinationals: this is the entrepreneurship of the future; the entrepreneurship based on cooperation and participation as the key to develop large human organizations able to recover local production and to reactivate the economy. The cooperative and participative organizations apply an innovative approach to grow in a massive way: the members of the organization participate very actively in the co-creation, management and development of the cooperative. In cooperative and participative organizations the clients are the owners of the organization. They do not ask for money to banks or investors, they self-finance. They are non-lucrative structures with an aim of changing the current model by adding as many members as possible. Some success cases are Park Slope Food Coop in Brooklyn or Som Energia in Spain." - Enladiana [9]
On the Monopolization of the Internet" As we enter 2015, 13 of the 33 most valuable corporations in the United States are internet firms, and nearly all of them enjoy monopolistic market power as economists have traditionally used the term. If you continue to scan down the list there are precious few internet firms to be found. There is not much of a middle class or even an upper-middle class of internet corporations to be found. This poses a fundamental problem for democracy, though it is one that mainstream commentators and scholars appear reluctant to acknowledge: If economic power is concentrated in a few powerful hands you have the political economy for feudalism, or authoritarianism, not democracy." - Robert McChesney [10]
Competing 'on top' of the Commons"One of the best ways to stimulate competition, innovation and lower prices is for participants in a market to honor the commons (a shared pool of resources, a minimal set of safety or performance standards) and then to compete "on top" of the commons. Instead of being able to reap easy profits from monopoly control over something everyone needs -- say, a computer operating system like Windows -- a company must work harder to "add value" in more specialized ways."
Obtaining Economic Advantage through Serving and Sharing"The future of advantage is radically different from the past for a simple reason: because it's economically better. 20th century advantage focuses firms on simply extracting resources from people, communities and society — and then protecting what they extract. 21st century advantage focuses firms on creating new resources, and allocating them better. The former is useful only to shareholders and managers — but the latter is useful to people, communities, and society. The old Microsoft was useful to shareholders, but a lot less useful to society — and that's exactly how Google and Apple attacked it, and won." Umair Haque [12]
The Sharing Economy should be distinguished from the Monetary Economy"... the quest for self-determination and meaningful and memorable experiences ultimately will hinge on people's understanding that they are not merely consuming a product, but that they are actually participating in a meaningful social process not guided by an extrinsic logic (profit), something that rather has intrinsic, or 'sovereign' value. I don't believe that these two can be fused into one - Eric Kluitenberg, iDC archive [13]
Market Logic vs. Network Logic"The philosophy that undergirds exchange also contrasts sharply across forms. In markets the standard strategy is to drive the hardest possible bargain in the immediate exchange. In networks, the preferred option is often one of creating indebtedness and reliance over the long haul. Each approach thus devalues the other: prosperous market traders would be viewed as petty and untrustworthy shysters in networks, while successful participants in networks who carried those practices into competitive markets would be viewed as foolish and naive... In a market context, it is clear to everyone concerned when a debt has been discharged, but such matters and not nearly as obvious in networks." - Walter Powell - "Niether Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization" 1990
From Profit-Maximization and Market-Orientation to Mission-FocusedProfit maximizing limits access to knowledge, by limiting it to paying customers. If anyone thinks this is just a side-effect of today's market incentives, then we can put the situation differently: Profit maximizing doesn't always limit access to knowledge, but is always ready to do so if it pays better. This proposition has a darker corollary: Profit maximizing doesn't always favor untruth, but is always ready to do so if it would pay better. ... Instead of hypnotically granting the primacy of markets in all sectors, as if there were no exceptions, we should remember that many organizations compromise profits or relinquish revenues in order to foster their missions, and that we all benefit from their dedication. Which institutions and sectors ought to do so, and how should we protect and support them to pursue their missions? Instead of smothering these questions for offending the religion of markets, we should open them for wider discussion. - Peter Suber [14] Markets without Money"Money is a very important and useful medium of exchange for high-value, tangible products. For small-value, intangible products, the costs tend to exceed the value of the transactions—especially when you add in the overhead associated with making payments at a distance. Fortunately, human beings are clever. We’ve begun to find a variety of substitutes for money that work better." - Tim Lee [15]
Social Commerce and the Intention Economy"only 13% of consumers say they buy products because of their ads. Contrast that to 60% of small business owners in North America that say they use peer recommendations to make their buying decisions and over 70% of 18-35 year olds who report the same for their media purchases." - Tara Hunt [16]
Monetization vs. Community value creation"When you try and "monetize your users", you accept the almost obscene assumption that people are meant to be pimped out, sold to the highest bidder, resources to be slashed, burned, and exploited. But that's not how the edgeconomy works. Businesses need what connected consumers have to give more than connected consumers need what businesses have to sell. Let's put that a little more formally. Monetization is ugly because it blinds us to the truth that value must flow in many directions. That's the essence of edge strategy, in fact." - Umair Haque [17]
The New Social Capitalism"Capitalism takes a narrow view of human nature, assuming that people are one dimensional beings concerned only with the pursuit of maximum profit. The concept of the free market, as generally understood, is based on this one- dimensional human being. Mainstream freemarket theory postulates that you are contributing to the society and the world in the best possible manner if you just concentrate on getting the most for yourself. [...] The presence of our multi- dimensional personalities means that not every business should be bound to serve the single objective of profit maximization" = Muhammad Yunus [18]
|
Short Citations
Conscious Capitalism vs. Peer ConsciousnessJoe Corbett [31]: 1. "Conscious Capitalism™ has been all the rage among integral and other new age accolades for some time now. Its promise is that capitalism can be redeemed, and the system of profit and consumption that are its foundation can be saved. Although it might sound reasonable, this proposition is really just a way to get an entire civilization to engage in a kind of spiritual by-passing of the fundamental transformation that is needed to redeem and even save humanity from impending doom. In fact, the very phrase “conscious capitalism” is a sort of double-speak code, which makes about as much sense as “conscious murder”, or “conscious feudalism”, or indeed, as if being a corporate Democrat was any better than being a neoliberal Republican. Lets be clear, Conscious Capitalism is like voluntary recycling, it is a mere gesture toward a more sustainable economic system, and is no solution to the globally systemic crisis of an insatiable drive toward ever increasing profit and consumption."
|
The P2P Business Encyclopedia |
Pages in category "Business"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 1,920 total.
(previous page) (next page)I
- Information Feudalism
- Information Goods
- Infrastructure Commons in Economic Perspective
- Ingenesist Project
- Initiative for Rethinking Economy
- Innocentive
- Innocentive Business Model
- Innovation
- Innovation and Production
- Innovation Decentralization
- Innovation Happens Elsewhere
- Innovation Markets
- Innovator's Dilemma
- Institute for Open Economic Networks
- Instrumental Value
- Integrative Crowdsourcing
- Intellectual Capital
- Intellectual Contributions
- Intellectual Origins of Value Co-Production
- Intellectual Property
- Intention Economy
- Intention-based Shipping
- Inter-Owner Trade Agreement
- Interaction Labor
- Internal Transformation of Corporations
- International Political Economy of Employability
- International Reciprocal Trade Association
- Internet Gift Economies
- Internet Reputation Systems
- Internet Telephony
- Internet TV Tuner
- Internet-Based Business Models and their Implications
- Internet-Enabled Consumer Movements and Campaigns
- Interoperability
- Interruption Science
- Interviewing Threadless
- Intraverse
- Introduction to Economic Abundance
- Introduction to the Solidarity Economy
- Invested Consumption
- Investment Fund
- Invisible Hand
- InWeave
- IPTV
- Iroquois Economy
- Is Web Advertizing Doomed
J
- JAK Bank
- James Boyle on Open Innovation and Intellectual Property
- Janne Kyttanen on Rapid Manufacturing
- JASecon
- Jason Fried on Collaboration and Productivity
- Jay Geeseman on Monetizing the Metaverse
- Jeff Howe on Crowdsourcing
- Jeff Howe on Incentive and Value in Crowdsourcing
- Jeff Howe on the Creative Wisdom of the Crowd
- Jeff Howe on the Role of Non-Monetary Incentives in Crowdsourcing and Social Production Projects
- Jeff Jarvis on the Internet as a Connection Machine
- Jeff Vail on the Diagonal Economy
- Jeremy Rifkin's Distributed Capitalism Scenario
- Jessica Lipnack and Jeffrey Stamps on Collaboration in the Networked Enterprise
- Johanna Blakely on Fashion and IP
- John D. Schmidt and James Quilligan on the Commons and Integral Capital
- John Hagel on Indicators for Understanding the User Revolution
- John Hagel on the New Economy of Work in a Web Squared World
- John Howkins
- John Michael Greer on the End of the Industrial Age
- Joi Ito on the Zen of Venture Investing in the Internet
- Jonathan Schwartz on the Age of Participation
- Joseph Stiglitz on the Economic Foundations of Intellectual Property
- Joy’s Law
- Jubilee Shares
- Juliet Schor on Plenitude through Building a Post-Work Society with Resilient Community Technologies
- Just Alternative Sustainable Economics
K
- Kaboodle Social Shopping Demo
- Ken Thompson and Lisa Kimball on the Biology of High-Performance Teams
- Kevin Kelly on How Value Is Generated in a Free Copy World
- Ki Work
- Knotworking
- Knowledge Management and Innovation in Open Source Software Communities
- Knowledge Organization - Evolution
- Knowledge Sharing
- Knowledge Spillovers
- Krowne's Laws of Free Software Production
- Kudunomics
L
- L3C
- Labor Commons Union
- Labor Quota System
- Labor-Controlled Venture Capital Funds
- Labour of User Co-creators
- Labourism
- Ladder of Participation in the Peer Economy
- Larry Harvey on the Gift Economy at Burning Man
- Latanya Sweeney on Privacy Rethinks in Privacy-Preserving Marketplaces
- Law of Limited Competition
- Lawrence Lessig on Architecting Innovation
- Lawrence Lessig on IP in the Digital Economy
- Layer Manufacturing
- Lead Markets
- Lead User
- Lead Users
- Lead Users Studies
- Lead-User Innovation
- Leaderless Organizations
- Leadership
- Leadership in an Age of Uncertainty
- Leadership in Communities of Practice
- Lee Bryant on Collective Intelligence inside the Enterprise
- Lee Bryant on Social Business Design for a Human-Centered World
- Legacy Infrastructure
- Legal Commons and Social Commons
- Leo Bonanni on SourceMap's and the Radical Transparency of Supply Chains
- LETS
- Levels of Wealth
- Liberation Management
- Life Inc
- Lifehacking
- Lightbulb Conspiracy
- Limited Liability Partnership
- Linus Law
- Linux Distributions
- Linux Kernel Development Process
- Liquid Content
- Lisa Gansky on the Shift to the Sharing Economy
- Literature Review of Buddhist Economics
- Living Economies
- Local Economy
- Locavesting
- Logic of the Market versus the Logic of the Commons
- LOHAS
- Long Descent
- Long Tail
- Long Tail Alliance
- Lords of the Rim
- Loser Generated Content
- Low Profit Limited Liability Companies
- Low-profit Limited Liability Company
- Ludocapitalism and the Scarcity in Gaming Worlds
- Lulu TV
- Lurkers - Passive Observers
M
- Macrowikinomics
- Make It Yourself
- Making Money with Open Source Hardware
- Making Of A Cybertariat
- Man, Energy, and Society
- Management by Objectives - Feudal Aspects
- Managing Open Innovation in Large Firms
- Managing without Growth
- Manifesto of the Appalled Economists
- Manifiesto Crowd
- Manufacturer-Centric Innovation
- Manufacturing Networks
- Marc Dangeard
- Marina Gorbis on Evolving from Social Technologies to Social Organizations
- Mark Anielski on the Economics of Happiness
- Mark Earls on Herds and Mass Collaboration
- Mark Shuttleworth on the Business Ecology of Ubuntu
- Market
- Market 3.0
- Market Adoption of Open Wireless vs. Licensed Spectrum
- Market Commons
- Market for Data Protection in Social Networks
- Market for Open Innovation
- Market Networks
- Market Principles
- Market Rebels
- Market Socialism
- Market Socialism or Socialization of the Market
- Market-Driven Politics
- Markets - Equity Aspects
- Markets as Conversations
- Markets without Capitalism
- Mary Beth Watson-Manheim on Achieving Power and Influence in the Globally Distributed Workplace
- Mash-Ups
- Mass Amateurization
- Mass Customization
- Mass Interpersonal Persuasion
- Massive Abundance
- Matt Mason
- Matt Mason on the Pirate's Dilemma
- Matt Stoller on the Dangers of Modern Digital Monopolies
- Meaning Organization
- Meat Sharing
- Media Crowdsourcing
- Meganiche
- Melissa Schilling on Global Technology Collaboration Networks
- Meltdown of 2008
- Meme
- Memediggers
- Memetrackers
- Mensarius Oath
- Mental Capitalism
- Mental Transaction Costs
- Merchant Guilds
- Mesh Business
- Meta-Markets
- Metanomics Video Archive
- Metaphysics of Value
- Metaverse Economies
- Metaverse Metrics
- Metcalfe's Law