Evaluating Democratic Economic Planning Models

From P2P Foundation
Revision as of 11:18, 22 July 2024 by Mbauwens (talk | contribs) (Created page with " '''* Article: Tremblay-Pepin, S. (2022). Five Criteria to Evaluate Democratic Economic Planning Models. Review of Radical Political Economics, 54(3), 265-280. [https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134221093747 doi]''' URL = https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/04866134221093747 =Description= "This article reviews three models of Democratic Economic Planning, those of Pat Devine and Fikret Adaman, Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel, and Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

* Article: Tremblay-Pepin, S. (2022). Five Criteria to Evaluate Democratic Economic Planning Models. Review of Radical Political Economics, 54(3), 265-280. doi

URL = https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/04866134221093747


Description

"This article reviews three models of Democratic Economic Planning, those of Pat Devine and Fikret Adaman, Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel, and Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell. Part of a larger research project aiming to merge certain features of these models, this article proposes five criteria to evaluate them. Following a proposal made by David Laibman, it adopts the organization and regulation criteria and add three others to them: limitation, formalization, and scope. Finally, the article offers a brief analysis of the models from those criteria."

Retrieved from "https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/index.php?title=Evaluating_Democratic_Economic_Planning_Models&oldid=141802"