[p2p-research] Again on mailing lists, was: Post-Depression first: Americans get more money from government than they give back | csmonitor.com
michelsub2004 at gmail.com
Sat Nov 28 02:31:37 CET 2009
ok, I see 2 problems, are there more?
one, in responding, we can choose, either top responses, or inline; I don't
see how a general rule can be imposed in this, as sometimes, inline is
required for micro-arguments and responses
the second problem, is that gmail hides previous postings, but that this may
be a problem for other email systems, so this might require manually
deleting each and every post?
Is that it?
So one problem cannot be solved, one can be solved by systematic manual
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Ted Smith <teddks at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 12:33 -0600, Kevin Carson wrote:
> > If only those who are interested respond, and the rest lurk, that's
> > fine.
> I'm certainly interested, but cannot respond because of the massive
> effort it would entail (reading in full every email and every referenced
> article in a given thread) and the intimidation factor (being hit by a
> massive response is not a friendly way to welcome newcomers).
> I think that I like the ideas that this list collectively espouses, but
> they're presented in such an inaccessible way that most of the time,
> this list is just noise to me. I would definitely appreciate an effort
> to make accessibility a priority.
> p2presearch mailing list
> p2presearch at listcultures.org
Work: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhurakij_Pundit_University - Research:
http://www.dpu.ac.th/dpuic/info/Research.html - Think thank:
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the p2presearch