[p2p-research] is open source design inferior
michelsub2004 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 10 12:05:13 CET 2009
that's a great way of putting it, though there is mutual stigmergic
coordination, isn't it?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Tomas Rawlings <tom at fluffylogic.net> wrote:
> Thanks for all these insigths ... I guess what I'm wondering is what is
>> motivation for peer communities to get the end user aspects right, if the
>> logic is primarily to solve one's own particular problems, even as it is
>> coordinated through a commons.
> As the design and adaptation in the process are cumulative, all it needs is
> one or two developers to have a user interface 'itch' and start the
> development down that path. The motivation is thus no different to the
> motivation to write any other aspect of OS software. Plus the end result is
> not coordinated by the commons, it is selected by the commons - thus the
> users and developers become akin to the environmental factors in ecology;
> selecting the version of an operating system that is 'fitests' for their
> needs; which will include aspects of usability and aesthetics.
> Tomas Rawlings
> Development Director, FluffyLogic Development Ltd.
> web: www.fluffylogic.net
> tel: 0117 9442233 -
> Also see:
> blog on film & interweb: www.plugincinema.com
> blog on p2p, media ecology & evolution: blog.catbot.org
> tweet: www.twitter.com/arclightfire
> p2presearch mailing list
> p2presearch at listcultures.org
Work: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhurakij_Pundit_University - Research:
http://www.dpu.ac.th/dpuic/info/Research.html - Think thank:
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the p2presearch